Teams

West Georgia (Sue Stovall)*

USTA Atlanta Spring - 65 & Over Women · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-20vs Wexford (Dede Young)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesSherri Hintz / Susan Hintz vs Leigh Hebbe / Beverly Patteson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelinda Davis / Velida Turner vs Joan Garrett / Cathy Hayward6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLisa Hogan / Susan McGaha vs Melissa Cooper / Vaden Creamer2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-03-13vs Soleil (Judy Shaffer)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSherri Hintz / Julie Chapman vs Kathy Furlong / Joy Martin6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSue Stovall / Jane Robinson vs Judy Shaffer / Tineke Arzbach2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVelida Turner / Patricia Martin vs Brenda Kees / Babs Baldwin7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-06vs Harrison TC (Susie Dufresne)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Hintz / Sherri Hintz vs Carol Pedersen / Judith Humphries6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJanis Aydelette / Melinda Davis vs Christine Brown / Elise Bishop5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRhonda Dickerson / Velida Turner vs Diane Williams / Sarah Thackston3-6, 2-6
2026-02-27vs Sibley Forest (Judi West)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesJanis Aydelette / Cathy Spivey vs Judith West / Sandra Jewell2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRhonda Dickerson / Sherri Hintz vs Carol Templeton / Diane Mathews6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMelinda Davis / Velida Turner vs Joan Skesavage / Eleanor Effinger0-6, 6-7
2026-02-20vs Sentinel Lake (Marti Felder)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesJanis Aydelette / Julie Chapman vs Carol Welsh / Missy Korwan3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Martin / Lisa Hogan vs Maureen Griffin / Kathy Romano6-4, 6-1
2026-02-13vs Bishops Green (Sally Millard)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesSherri Hintz / Susan Hintz vs Martha Battle / Cindy Brizendine6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCathy Spivey / Patricia Martin vs Karen Tamayo / Dale White7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan McGaha / Velida Turner vs Melody Tosi / Patricia McClure7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA Atlanta/Jennie Jones511539123
2USTA Atlanta/Claire Hatten511539101
3Rockdale (Deborah Wilson)*5114414150
4Harrison TC (Susie Dufresne)*5112616161
5West Georgia (Sue Stovall)*4213513133
6Sibley Forest (Judi West)*4211717155
7Central Park (Debbie Smith)*3310823167
8Bishops Green (Sally Millard)*2481024184
9Soleil (Judy Shaffer)*2471124156
10Burdette TC (Joyce Frederick)*1541428195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Susan Hintz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Sherri Hintz
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.40
Julie Chapman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Cathy Spivey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Rhonda Dickerson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Melinda Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Janis Aydelette
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Susan McGaha
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Velida Turner
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.98
Sue Stovall
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Lisa Hogan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jane Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Martin
published
Tamara Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherri Hintz + Susan Hintz15368% games+11.2% vs expected
Melinda Davis + Velida Turner9358% games+9.4% vs expected
Rhonda Dickerson + Cathy Spivey3355% games+6.9% vs expected
Patricia Martin + Cathy Spivey11460% games+6.0% vs expected
Sherri Hintz + Patricia Martin9162% games+5.8% vs expected
Melinda Davis + Janis Aydelette6258% games+5.2% vs expected
Lisa Hogan + Janis Aydelette6258% games+4.0% vs expected
Melinda Davis + Cathy Spivey11362% games+3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Hintz
23W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.62
Sherri Hintz
73W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%56%43%
3.48
Julie Chapman
21W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Cathy Spivey
80W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
Rhonda Dickerson
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Melinda Davis
60W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Janis Aydelette
56W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20
Susan McGaha
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Velida Turner
88W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Sue Stovall
83W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%43%
2.98
Lisa Hogan
22W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.65
Jane Robinson
23W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Martin
71W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tamara Smith
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.