Teams

MCTA40/Marlowe/RHTC

COMBO 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult Men - 6.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 17 7:00 PM
Rock Hill Tennis Center
Sep 24 7:00 PM
Rock Hill Tennis Center
2026-09-03vs MCTA40/Kanase/RHTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJonathan Hurd / Mike Anthony vs Rafael Balderrama / Kelly Stone6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCedric Armstrong / Micah Lucky vs Ajay Bhingare / PATRICK TIGHE3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Marlowe / Brian Ng vs Alonza Jones / Bhushan Patki6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-27vs MCTA40/Kanase/RHTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesJonathan Hurd / Mike Anthony vs Parikshit Kanase / Bala Govardhan Palagiri6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNan Xu / Sean Kelleher vs Ajay Bhingare / Rohit Soman2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Marlowe / Frantz Etienne vs Michael Chaffman / Durga Deepak Guntuboyina1-6, 3-6
2026-07-30vs MCTA40/Kanase/RHTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesJonathan Hurd / Mike Anthony vs Ajay Bhingare / PATRICK TIGHE6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTimothy Pavkov / Cedric Armstrong vs Dzianis Zhynko / Bala Govardhan Palagiri2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Marlowe / Paul Horne vs Alonza Jones / Kelly Stone2-6, 2-6
2026-07-16vs MCTA40/Kanase/RHTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesJonathan Hurd / Mike Anthony vs Michael Chaffman / PATRICK TIGHE6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRobert Marlowe / Brian Ng vs Rafael Balderrama / Kelly Stone3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSean Kelleher / Micah Lucky vs Durga Deepak Guntuboyina / Bala Govardhan Palagiri4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult Men - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Jonathan Hurd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Cedric Armstrong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Brian Ng
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.17
Robert Marlowe
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Nan Xu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Micah Lucky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Timothy Pavkov
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Paul Horne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timothy Pavkov + Micah Lucky213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Hurd
73W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Cedric Armstrong
4W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Brian Ng
31W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.23
Robert Marlowe
25W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
Nan Xu
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Micah Lucky
31W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Timothy Pavkov
57W–61L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Paul Horne
6W–51L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.