Teams

OLYMPIC CM6.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 6.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.19 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-04vs ROLLING HILLS CM6.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesEmmet Peppers / Paul Dyliacco vs Garry Devaney / George Papadoyannis4-6, 4-6
2025-09-07vs ROLLING HILLS CM6.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesPaul Dyliacco / Michael Corey vs Michael Almeraris / Michael Levy4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
John Cella
published
3.51
Brian McPeake
published 3.5
3.46
Alexander Schmitt
published 3.5
3.46
Pat Robertson
published
3.38
Thomas Byrne
published
3.38
Alex Boswell
published 3.5
3.36
Tom Yu
published
3.21
Rory Bertiglia
published
3.17
Thomas Boyce
published
3.16
Tim Avila
published
3.05
Walt Willig
published
3.01
Denis Murphy
published 3
2.94
Seth Peckler
published
2.90
Elliott Robbins
published 3
2.81
Dennis Williams
published 3
2.80
Jeremy Blaustein
published
2.78
Aaron Hattenbach
published 3
2.73
Matthew Joe
published
2.69
Paul Dyliacco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
John Morrison
published
2.41
Jim Finberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denis Murphy + Tim Avila303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Cella
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.64
3.5
Brian McPeake
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Alexander Schmitt
7W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Pat Robertson
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Thomas Byrne
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Alex Boswell
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Tom Yu
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.36
Rory Bertiglia
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Thomas Boyce
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Tim Avila
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.16
Walt Willig
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Denis Murphy
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Seth Peckler
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Elliott Robbins
7W–15L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Gonzalo Rojo Zarrabeitia
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Dennis Williams
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Jeremy Blaustein
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Aaron Hattenbach
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
Matthew Joe
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Paul Dyliacco
6W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
John Morrison
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
Jim Finberg
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.