Teams

Cynerjy

2022 Montgomery Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Montgomery Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-04-23vs Kim 18+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEmily Schabacker / Majed Hamawy vs Sean Alewine / Angela Helder0-6, 1-6
2022-04-20vs Kim 18+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEmily Schabacker / Majed Hamawy vs Andrew Brammer / Jillian Kingwood1-6, 3-6
2022-04-14vs Kim 18+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Yazdani / James Hastings vs Blake Munshell / Kelsey Forbes3-6, 2-6
2022-04-11vs Kim 18+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Yazdani / Raymond Barry vs Blake Munshell / Kelsey Forbes3-6, 0-6
2022-04-07vs Kim 18+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHakeem Clark / Shirin Ahmed vs Kelsey Forbes / Jim Leveque3-6, 4-6
2022-04-05vs Kim 18+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHakeem Clark / Shirin Ahmed vs Bill Hartman / Angela Helder3-6, 1-6
2022-03-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Yazdani / Earnest White vs Andrew Brammer / Christina Leach2-6, 1-6
2022-03-11vs Kim 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBHUPAL REDDY THOTI REDDY / Emily Schabacker vs Bill Hartman / Jillian Kingwood1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesShirin Ahmed / Earnest White vs Maureen Morais / Todd Templeman5-7, 2-6
2022-03-05vs Kim 18+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Emily Schabacker vs Samit Verma / Christina Leach2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Cynthia Munshell
published 3.5
3.24
Hakeem Clark
published 3.5
3.17
Shirin Ahmed
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Earnest White
published 3
3.00
2.98
Majed Hamawy
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.95
Lisa Yazdani
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Emily Schabacker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Emily Barry
published 3
2.50
Raymond Barry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Majed Hamawy + Emily Schabacker0530% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
BHUPAL REDDY THOTI REDDY
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Cynthia Munshell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Hakeem Clark
5W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Shirin Ahmed
198W–134L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Earnest White
10W–7L career · type M · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Courtney McDonald
34W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.00
3
Majed Hamawy
379W–517L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Lisa Yazdani
67W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Emily Schabacker
158W–173L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Emily Barry
15W–19L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Raymond Barry
2W–16L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.