Teams

Pond/Selbak

2025 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Mckenna Selbak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Alena Lauritsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2025-08-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlexis Pond / Mckenna Selbak vs Rochelle Pluymers / Rebecca Griffith6-1, 6-1
2025-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlexis Pond / Mckenna Selbak vs Kaie Wellman / Julie Bradford7-5, 6-3
2025-07-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlexis Pond / Mckenna Selbak vs Crystal Bryant / Tami McAra6-3, 6-3
2025-07-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAlena Lauritsen / Alexis Pond vs Ariana White / Nina Hanson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-07-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlexis Pond / Mckenna Selbak vs Megan Soucy / Lindsey Kahler6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAlexis Pond / Mckenna Selbak vs Cate Harrington / Rachel Ritchie6-0, 7-6
2025-06-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAlena Lauritsen / Mckenna Selbak vs Tomoko Iwata / Sharon Mathew6-3, 6-4
2025-06-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAlexis Pond / Mckenna Selbak vs Erin Casey / Colleen Nolan6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Mckenna Selbak
23W–18L career
1%99%0%
3.75
3.5
Alena Lauritsen
129W–74L career
0%67%33%
3.56

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.