Teams

Cottonwood Club-Briesacher/Gardner

2023 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-14vs Liberty Park-Jones/MoretonWon 20
W#1 Female SinglesDorene Sambado vs Nicole Cramer6-2, 6-2
W#2 Female DoublesDonna Pizza / Andrea Kehl vs Julie Jones / Ann Trentman6-4, 5-3
2023-12-07vs Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/HronekSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesHolli Turner / Kathy Miller-Rees vs Mandy Berg / Amber Greenwood6-2, 1-5, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesLisa Hakes / Christine Littleford vs Deyce Peterson / Rosa McGuire5-7, 4-3, 0-1
2023-11-30vs Liberty Park Tennis-Young/SwensenWon 21
L#1 Female DoublesKathy Miller-Rees / Christine Littleford vs Christine Fotheringham / Julie Cooley3-6, 5-6
W#1 Female SinglesDorene Sambado vs Amy Earl6-2, 6-1
W#2 Female DoublesLisa Hakes / Laura Williams vs Mindy Dunyon / Annette Knight6-0, 6-2
2023-11-16vs Salt Lake Tennis-RasmussenWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesAndrea Kehl / Holli Turner vs Marsha Elmore / Karen Nickolaisen6-1, 6-3
W#1 Female SinglesWhitney Fautin vs Jan Chamberlain6-2, 4-2
2023-11-09vs Sunpro-Warren/CarterLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesAndrea Kehl / Donna Pizza vs Karen Nielson / Shauna Carter2-6, 3-5
2023-11-02vs Liberty Park-Jones/MoretonWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesLisa Hakes / Holli Turner vs Jennifer Moreton / Cassandra Suite-Smith6-3, 6-3
W#1 Female SinglesWhitney Fautin vs Rachel Mills6-1, 6-1
W#2 Female DoublesLois Peterson / Kathy Miller-Rees vs Julie Jones / Janice Stokes-Burns6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RISE AC-Glines6017719179
2Liberty Park Tennis-Young/Swensen5117718188
3Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek5117720167
4Cottonwood Club-Briesacher/Gardner4218616161
5Sports Mall-Affleck42141025199
6Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry3315924186
7Sunpro-Warren/Carter33101431196
8Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks24101433225
9Ivory Ridge-Holland/Jarvie24101433227
10Sunpro-Leishman/Mortensen1561837227
11Salt Lake Tennis-Rasmussen1551939252
12Liberty Park-Jones/Moreton0651941246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Whitney Fautin
usually #1 Female Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Kathy Miller-Rees
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.80
Alli Gardner
published 4
3.78
Courtney Bedke
published 4
Carole Sharp
published 4
3.72
Lois Peterson
published
3.71
Christine Littleford
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Lori Briesacher
published 4
3.68
Dorene Sambado
usually #1 Female Singles 100% · published 4
3.65
Lee Chase
published
3.63
Lisa Hakes
usually #2 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Holli Turner
published
3.55
Donna Pizza
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Andrea Kehl
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Janice Smith
published
Angie Nelden
published 3.5
3.20
Lauren Annunziata
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #3 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Sara Green
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Nelden + Alli Gardner17166% games+14.5% vs expected
Lee Chase + Kathy Miller-Rees4264% games+9.5% vs expected
Holli Turner + Kathy Miller-Rees4449% games+8.8% vs expected
Carole Sharp + Janice Smith21563% games+4.9% vs expected
Alli Gardner + Whitney Fautin13163% games+4.4% vs expected
Alli Gardner + Kathy Miller-Rees5158% games+4.0% vs expected
Andrea Kehl + Holli Turner221156% games+3.9% vs expected
Christine Littleford + Holli Turner5161% games+3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Whitney Fautin
191W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Kathy Miller-Rees
149W–147L career · 3 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.97
4
Alli Gardner
116W–48L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Courtney Bedke
86W–40L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Carole Sharp
90W–43L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lois Peterson
52W–45L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Christine Littleford
116W–72L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Lori Briesacher
143W–99L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Dorene Sambado
102W–113L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Lee Chase
48W–33L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Lisa Hakes
83W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.63
Holli Turner
79W–59L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Donna Pizza
165W–106L career · 2 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Andrea Kehl
125W–86L career · 3 lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43
Janice Smith
127W–60L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Angie Nelden
80W–71L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Lauren Annunziata
136W–138L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Sara Green
32W–76L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.