← Teams

LOTC-Vargas/Lyman

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Kristi Vargas
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
—
Julie Hester
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Kristen Fisher
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.32
Kathleen Budnick
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Sarah Bradley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Ann Skoog
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
—
Lisa West
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 0
Results8 ties
2019-04-07Lost 1–2
L#2 DoublesKristi Vargas / Lisa West vs Tao Hua / Kaelin Teo6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKristen Fisher vs Kristin Spear3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Kristin Lyman vs Cathy Gatzke / Lori Hamilton6-3, 7-5
2019-03-01Lost 1–3
L#1 SinglesKristi Vargas vs Allison Fryman6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristin Lyman / Kathleen Budnick vs Barbara Seatter / Elda Nelson6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAnn Skoog vs Danielle Barrett6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Bradley / Lisa West vs Lucia von Flotow / Katherine Kralj6-0, 6-4
2019-02-24Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJulie Hester / Kristi Vargas vs Katherine Kralj / Hillary Ostlund4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDesiree Whitehall / Sarah Bradley vs Crystal Bryant / Irene Feldun6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristin Lyman / Kathleen Budnick vs BreAnn Granville / Kari Martin6-1, 6-0
2019-02-16Lost 1–2
L#1 SinglesKristi Vargas vs Veronica White6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnn Skoog / Pat Berends vs Carrie Pelz / Margaret Sivertsen6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Kristin Lyman vs Ellen Bowman / Dongju Won4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-02-02Won 2–1
W#2 DoublesJulie Hester / Kristi Vargas vs Monica Rivares / Rebecca Jones2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAnn Skoog vs Lisa Gangelhoff6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Sherri Sacconaghi vs Courtney Ngai / Annette Garske7-5, 6-1
2019-01-27Lost 0–3
L#2 DoublesKristen Fisher / Kathleen Budnick vs Babette Zielinski / Debbie Smith6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAnn Skoog vs Jamie Slonaker7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristi Vargas / Julie Hester vs Leslie OBrien / Allison Reid7-5, 6-3
2019-01-19Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesLisa West / Sherri Sacconaghi vs Allison Gregory / Terri Pickard6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKristen Fisher vs Ginny Larner6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristi Vargas / Kristin Lyman vs Lori Bernhardt / Heidi Wilcox6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Pat Berends vs Stephanie Leeding / Sally Lovett6-2, 6-1
2019-01-13Lost 1–3
L#1 SinglesKathleen Budnick vs Halle Jackson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa West / Heather Griffin vs Claire Adamsick / Melissa Light6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAnn Skoog vs Jenny Pizot6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJulie Hester / Pat Berends vs Kelly Asbridge / Diane Middlebrooks6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kristi Vargas
82W–131L career
0%99%1%
3.78
4
Julie Hester
9W–25L career · type M
not enough data
—
4
Kristen Fisher
67W–52L career
8%92%0%
3.65
3.5
Kathleen Budnick
138W–170L career
0%98%2%
3.32
3.5
Sarah Bradley
25W–43L career · type M
not enough data
—
3.5
Ann Skoog
43W–66L career
12%88%0%
3.10
0
Lisa West
26W–44L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.