Teams

KY/LOU/MEADOWS/CROWE

2025 USTA LEAGUE 55 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-09vs KY/LOU/PZREWORSKI/LANELost 01
L#1 DoublesJoan Coleman / Rebecca Hatch-Purnell vs Christine Przeworski / Mei Dai2-6, 4-6
2025-02-21vs KY/LOU/POLTER/DALTONWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoan Coleman / Rebecca Hatch-Purnell vs Mary Shively / Tammy Pollock6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Rassiga / Linda Mulloy vs Lawanda Page / Lillian Hunt6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Cece Hagan
published 3.5
3.39
Vikki Meadows
published
3.39
Vanya Smith
published
3.36
Joanne Lynch
published
3.35
Joan Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Linda Crowe
published
3.33
Michele Horn
published
3.33
Rebecca Hatch-Purnell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Michele Coan
published
Carol Tittel
published 3.5
3.16
Shelia Colyer
published
3.14
Anna Quigley
published 3.5
3.12
Jennifer Rassiga
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Janice Lechleiter
published
Linda Mulloy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vanya Smith + Michele Horn2351% games+2.7% vs expected
Joanne Lynch + Jennifer Rassiga224 matchesnot enough data
Joan Coleman + Rebecca Hatch-Purnell123 matchesnot enough data
Vikki Meadows + Michele Coan033 matchesnot enough data
Michele Coan + Vanya Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cece Hagan
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Vikki Meadows
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
Vanya Smith
16W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Joanne Lynch
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.36
Joan Coleman
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Linda Crowe
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Michele Horn
18W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Rebecca Hatch-Purnell
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Michele Coan
26W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Carol Tittel
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelia Colyer
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Anna Quigley
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Jennifer Rassiga
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Janice Lechleiter
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Linda Mulloy
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.