Teams

Oaksmith

2025 Howard Adult 18 & Over · Howard Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.44 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
W#3 DoublesSandy Segrist / Monica Targonski vs Danielle Gourdine / Angela Curry6-4, 6-1
L#1 DoublesSandy Segrist / Lynn Gorman vs Ruth Go Fernando Randle / Yngrid Sierra6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGena Conron / Stephanie Ruskin vs Kylie Gaskins / Karen Spano4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBriana Stine vs Morgan Miller0-5
W#2 DoublesSandy Segrist / Margaret Asher vs Mary Klyap / Deborah Dettmer6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLynne Ensor vs Julia Heeter6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElisabeth Garcia-Wade / Tammi Molavi vs Jeanne Celtnieks / Patricia Jenkins1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesJoanne Stine / Briana Stine vs Samantha Norris / Sanghee Lee2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLynne Ensor vs Thu Pham6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMonica Targonski / Gena Conron vs Angela Gardner / Alicia Mabry6-3, 6-2
2025-05-10vs Chung - The Rack-ettesLost 13
L#1 DoublesBrenda Crowe / Sandy Segrist vs Leslie Kendrick / Linda Tsai1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLynne Ensor / Joanne Stine vs Teresa Russin / Maria Cristina Sanchez1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBriana Stine vs Stephanie Jurkovic6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTammi Molavi / Monica Targonski vs GENA CHUNG / Sung Cho0-6, 6-7
2025-05-01vs Davidson - Sets In The CityLost 12
L#1 DoublesGena Conron / Lynne Ensor vs Julie Edwards / Tracy Flaherty2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBriana Stine vs Karin Davis6-2, 2-0
L#2 SinglesMarie Sokoloff vs Chrissy Adair4-6, 3-4
2025-04-28vs Ruggiero - Baby's Got BackhandsWon 20
W#1 SinglesMarie Sokoloff vs Anna Kuligowski6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrenda Crowe / Gena Conron vs Shannon Biggs / Shelly Chamness6-2, 6-2
2025-04-24vs MacDonald - MacAttack 3.5 18+Won 21
L#1 SinglesMarie Sokoloff vs Natalie Leveque4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Asher / Lynne Ensor vs Brittany Muth / Debra MacDonald6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSherry Houff / Gena Conron vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-15vs Phan - Spin-derellasSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBriana Stine vs Kiley Murphy6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLynne Ensor / Elisa Oaksmith vs Linda Shaffer / Kristin Wallace3-6, 2-6
2025-04-09vs Mccullough - Bounce-tasticWon 30
W#1 SinglesBriana Stine vs Hannah Arnold Smith6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAshling Pollard / Lynne Ensor vs Colleen Quinlan / Lindsay Preissler6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTammi Molavi / Stephanie Ruskin vs Lena Brandenburg / Jennifer Sinkule6-3, 6-2
2025-03-31vs Battista - Net Setters 18Split 11
W#1 SinglesLynne Ensor vs Lesli Thompson7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTammi Molavi / Stephanie Ruskin vs Eunice Winfree / Veronica Cagle6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Briana Stine
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.49
Marie Sokoloff
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Lorinda Rawlings
published
3.38
Lynne Ensor
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.34
3.28
Lynn Gorman
published
3.23
Margaret Asher
published
3.19
Tammi Molavi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Sandy Segrist
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Gena Conron
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
Sherry Houff
published
3.11
Monica Targonski
published
3.10
Brenda Crowe
published 3.5
3.10
Ashling Pollard
published 3.5
2.98
Elisa Oaksmith
published
2.93
Joanne Stine
published
2.72
Stephanie Ruskin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammi Molavi + Stephanie Ruskin171948% games−1.5% vs expected
Stephanie Ruskin + Gena Conron131348% games−2.5% vs expected
Tammi Molavi + Gena Conron4356% gamesnot enough data
Sherry Houff + Monica Targonski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Briana Stine
71W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Marie Sokoloff
276W–199L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Lorinda Rawlings
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Lynne Ensor
39W–23L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Elisabeth Garcia-Wade
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Lynn Gorman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Margaret Asher
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Tammi Molavi
114W–131L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Sandy Segrist
116W–94L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Gena Conron
86W–123L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Sherry Houff
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Monica Targonski
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Brenda Crowe
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Ashling Pollard
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Elisa Oaksmith
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Joanne Stine
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93
3
Stephanie Ruskin
141W–154L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.