Teams

1 Avalon Mier/Bland

2022 Richmond Mixed 40 & Over · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.54 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-22vs 6 Woodlake CabralWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnnmarie Lobred / Richard Bland vs Karen Hannon / Patrick Urban6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlice Ulrichs / John French vs Cindy Birnbaum / Ron Birnbaum7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKim Schultz / Glenn Mizrach vs Wendy Learn / Joe Fowler6-1, 6-4
2022-07-18vs 8 MAC TalamoWon 10
W#3 DoublesSamantha Mier / Glenn Mizrach vs Kim Michael / Billy Michael6-2, 6-3
2022-06-29vs 4 Avalon Ghita 7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSamantha Mier / John French vs Sarah Croft-Whelan / Laurent Beausergent0-6, 3-6
2022-06-20vs 2 ACAC DavisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Gregory Blouch vs Grace Kim / Matthew Cox6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSamantha Mier / Glenn Mizrach vs Steve Leighty / Alicia Zatcoff3-6, 0-6
2022-06-15vs 11 RCC Koch 7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDiana Dull / Richard Bland vs Gary Wills / Amy Boschen5-7, 1-6
2022-06-12vs 7 Raintree BryanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlice Ulrichs / Barry George vs Crystal May / William Bryan5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnnmarie Lobred / Ian Shupack vs Jennifer Morris / Paul Haley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-08vs 10 Hermitage Martin/BergeronWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn French / Kim Schultz vs Betsy Kersey / Brian Betz6-3, 6-3
2022-06-01vs 9 ACAC Advantage 7.0 StephensLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Johnson / Brad Williamson vs Aimee Vaughn / Tracy Marks2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAlice Ulrichs / Barry George vs Mary Knick / Steve Hamant2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Robert Calhoun vs Greg Deeb / Isabel Lee1-6, 4-6
2022-05-20vs 5 ACAC Crane 40Won 21
L#1 DoublesBrad Williamson / Annmarie Lobred vs Jeff Bosch / Kimberly Jones6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Robert Calhoun vs Jonathan Meade / Kathie Naylor6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRichard Bland / Diana Dull vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-09vs 3 Burkwood StewartLost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Robert Calhoun vs Joseph Golden / Mary Ann Cox1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
David Rathke
published 4
3.61
Annmarie Lobred
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Robert Calhoun
published
3.41
Ian Shupack
published 3.5
3.37
Nancy Mihalko
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Brad Williamson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Richard Bland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
George Brickley
published 3.5
3.29
Diana Dull
published 3.5
3.26
Alice Ulrichs
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Gregory Blouch
published 3.5
3.14
Kim Schultz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
John French
published
3.06
Glenn Mizrach
published 3
2.85
Samantha Mier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
TONYA URQUHART
published
Lisa Voeks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Bland + Alice Ulrichs12264% gamesnot enough data
Annmarie Lobred + Richard Bland10263% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Mihalko + Richard Bland4357% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Mihalko + Robert Calhoun4168% gamesnot enough data
Brad Williamson + Alice Ulrichs2345% gamesnot enough data
Samantha Mier + David Rathke2339% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Mihalko + Brad Williamson314 matchesnot enough data
Samantha Mier + Richard Bland134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Rathke
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Annmarie Lobred
155W–109L career · 3 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
Robert Calhoun
28W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Ian Shupack
14W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Nancy Mihalko
182W–109L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Brad Williamson
176W–167L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Richard Bland
251W–138L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
George Brickley
13W–20L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Diana Dull
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Alice Ulrichs
86W–77L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Gregory Blouch
8W–32L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Kim Schultz
75W–79L career · 2 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
John French
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Glenn Mizrach
13W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
Samantha Mier
32W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
TONYA URQUHART
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Lisa Voeks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.