Teams

C 7.5W 2 CC Horgan

2023 NEOTA Combo Spring · NEOTA 7.5W Combo Spring

17 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-04-28vs C 7.5W 2 SP DeLucaWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Maleski / Natalie Marotta vs Sarah Grauel / Kathy Green7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDianne Fowler / Danielle Simpson vs Elizabeth DeLuca / Christine Brucken6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKaryn Costin / Deborah Rachek vs Donna Reynolds / Michelle Sutton6-2, 7-6
2023-04-14vs C 7.5W 2 TP SchaffnerLost 12
L#1 DoublesWendy Cohn / Cheryl Chase vs Cora Shane / Amanda Petit0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDianne Fowler / Danielle Simpson vs Shelby Schaffner / Erin Baginski6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJessica Jenkins / Trina Galauner vs Kristianne Bontempo / Rebecca Voris4-6, 4-6
2023-03-31vs C 7.5W 2 GR JohnsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesWendy Cohn / Cheryl Chase vs Renee Weaver / Trisha Kohut1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMary Maleski / Natalie Marotta vs Michelle Simmons / Valerie Johnson6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTrina Galauner / Sharon Horgan vs Melissa Owen / Heather Alexander7-5, 6-4
2023-03-24vs C 7.5W 3 PW2 DeWerthWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaria Ganim / Natalie Marotta vs Erin Carpenter / Sarah Boswell6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Maleski / Danielle Simpson vs Ann Dewerth / Katherine Reid6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Capes / Marnie Walcutt vs Celia Reid / Nancy Koehler6-4, 6-3
2023-03-17vs C 7.5W 3 PW1 AtkinsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesKelly Capes / Danielle Simpson vs Kathleen Kmiecik / Susan Scott7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Maleski / Trina Galauner vs Alison Boeckman / Amanda de Leon1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaryn Costin / Natalie Marotta vs Jennifer Atkinson / Rochelle Sladek6-2, 6-2
2023-03-10vs C 7.5W 3 NR2 WissmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaryn Costin / Deborah Rachek vs J Kennedy / Kit Quigley6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Capes / Danielle Simpson vs Stacey Varuolo / Erin Hubbard6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSharon Horgan / Carla Greenwood vs Mary Partridge / Amy Koziara6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2023-03-03vs C 7.5W 3 NR1 BartramWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaria Ganim / Cheryl Chase vs Toni Weigand / Julia Bartram6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMary Maleski / Natalie Marotta vs Margaret VanDine / Amy Grace6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSharon Horgan / Marnie Walcutt vs Lisa Gallagher / Margaret Trombetta6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-02-24vs C 7.5W 2 SP DeLucaLost 03
L#1 DoublesNatalie Marotta / Karyn Costin vs Kathy Green / Sarah Grauel7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJessica Jenkins / Carla Greenwood vs MAGGIE GRAY / Amy Hissong6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMaria Ganim / Marnie Walcutt vs Elizabeth DeLuca / Christine Brucken3-6, 6-7
2023-02-10vs C 7.5W 2 TP SchaffnerWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaria Ganim / Natalie Marotta vs Cora Shane / Amanda Petit6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDianne Fowler / Deborah Rachek vs Jamie Fox / Lisa Lutz6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSharon Horgan / Carla Greenwood vs Kristianne Bontempo / Kimberly Dickason6-1, 6-0
2023-02-03vs C 7.5W 2 GR JohnsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaryn Costin / Danielle Simpson vs Loralee Daily / Cindy Gamby2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Capes / Natalie Marotta vs Michelle Simmons / Valerie Johnson6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Ganim / Marnie Walcutt vs Kay McHolm / Denise Fehr7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · NEOTA 7.5W Combo Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W 3 NR2 Wissman8221930280
2C 7.5W 2 CC Horgan73181228267
3C 7.5W MV Lyublinski6219514178
4C 7.5W 2 GR Johnson64181228263
5C 7.5W 2 SP DeLuca64171330261
6C 7.5W AVB Hendricks53131126202
7C 7.5W WE Fenner53131127225
8C 7.5W 3 NR1 Bartram46151533270
9C 7.5W 2 TP Schaffner37111942311
10C 7.5W 3 PW1 Atkinson37102045307
11C 7.5W 3 PW2 DeWerth37102046311
12C 7.5W CRC Morrisroe2681632239
13C 7.5W WR Daberko2671736239

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Mary Maleski
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.96
Karyn Costin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.88
Dianne Fowler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Jessica Jenkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Maria Ganim
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.70
Natalie Marotta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.51
Trina Galauner
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.50
Sharon Horgan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Rosemary Cugliari
published
3.38
Wendy Cohn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Cheryl Chase
published 3.5
3.19
Carla Greenwood
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Marnie Walcutt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Danielle Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Deborah Rachek
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Nancy Sobecks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Capes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Simpson + Dianne Fowler5066% games+8.5% vs expected
Marnie Walcutt + Natalie Marotta14557% games+6.9% vs expected
Sharon Horgan + Maria Ganim8753% games+5.4% vs expected
Danielle Simpson + Carla Greenwood3447% games+5.1% vs expected
Danielle Simpson + Trina Galauner151154% games+5.1% vs expected
Mary Maleski + Maria Ganim7259% games+4.7% vs expected
Dianne Fowler + Maria Ganim10358% games+4.5% vs expected
Rosemary Cugliari + Karyn Costin8460% games+4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Maleski
133W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.98
Karyn Costin
82W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Dianne Fowler
103W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.88
Jessica Jenkins
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
3.80
Maria Ganim
142W–75L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Natalie Marotta
108W–56L career · 8 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Trina Galauner
93W–71L career · 5 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
Sharon Horgan
119W–107L career · 4 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
Rosemary Cugliari
113W–81L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
Wendy Cohn
29W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Cheryl Chase
35W–57L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Carla Greenwood
30W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Marnie Walcutt
81W–83L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Danielle Simpson
106W–96L career · 6 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Deborah Rachek
51W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
Nancy Sobecks
46W–99L career · 1 line in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Kelly Capes
47W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.