Teams

MidAtlantic/Moore/Adult18&Over3.0W

2024 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-06-05vs BHSC-McCullochWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristina Beverage / Stephanie Radlick vs Christine Streit / Julie McCulloch6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Faith Zabek6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJamie Heffernan / Mary McFarland vs Linda Jordan / Susan Knight6-4, 6-3
2024-05-29vs Forest Lakes-SanfordWon 20
W#2 SinglesAnita McGinty vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLindy Kastendike / Gwenedd Murray vs Susan Wall / Beth Kohler6-0, 6-2
2024-05-22vs ACAC Game Changers-BarrettWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Radlick / Christina Beverage vs Stephanie Lewandowski / Elizabeth Glover6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Karin Jones4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJamie Heffernan / Mary McFarland vs Samantha Bates / Ann Hague6-3, 6-2
2024-05-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesLindy Kastendike / Leigh Rinckel vs Lisa Jackson / Deborah Smith6-2, 7-5
2024-05-13vs Keswick-MerrickWon 30
W#1 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Melissa Zeller7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaggie Moore / Mary McFarland vs Susan Tracy / Cailin Collier6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLeigh Rinckel / Lindy Kastendike vs Gillian Grant / Amelia Black2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-08vs BHSC The Slice Girls-KeenerWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie Radlick / Christina Beverage vs Laura Pietro / Gretchen Masselli6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary McFarland / Jamie Heffernan vs Alice Raucher / Sherry Lake6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAnita McGinty vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-01vs Farmington-FaulconerWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristina Beverage / Stephanie Radlick vs Jill Lord / Shannon Mrazik6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeigh Rinckel / Lindy Kastendike vs Kate Tusing / Margaret Hancock6-3, 6-3
2024-04-29vs Not So Sweet-NguyenWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristina Beverage / Stephanie Radlick vs Leah Burger / Blair Hubbard6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesMary McFarland vs Maren Ward6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLindy Kastendike / Leigh Rinckel vs Margie Halinski / Erika Herz6-3, 6-1
2024-04-24vs Forest Lakes-SanfordWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristina Beverage / Jamie Heffernan vs Christine Eagleson / Susan Wall6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Mary Manley7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLindy Kastendike / Leigh Rinckel vs Marie Moss / Shauna Hogg6-4, 7-5
2024-04-17vs BHSC Racketeers-RyanWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristina Beverage / Stephanie Radlick vs Silvia Blemker / Carleen Kupcis6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMary McFarland vs Kailey Boatright6-4, 6-3
2024-04-10vs BHSC-McCullochSplit 11
W#2 DoublesChristina Beverage / Jamie Heffernan vs Shannon Henderson / Faith Zabek6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Allie Bryan6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-03-27vs ACAC Game Changers-BarrettWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Radlick / Christina Beverage vs Lauren Thraves / Karin Jones6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMary McFarland vs Christina Meyer4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLeigh Rinckel / Lindy Kastendike vs Ann Hague / Mary Taylor6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Maggie Moore
published
3.40
Stephanie Radlick
published
3.36
Christina Nicholaou
published 3.5
3.24
Christina Beverage
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.15
Megan Wyant
published
3.11
Anita McGinty
usually #2 Singles 55%, also #1 Singles 36% · published 3.5
3.10
Mary McFarland
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.04
Jeanne Ward
published
2.98
Gwenedd Murray
published
2.94
Leigh Rinckel
published
2.92
Lindy Kastendike
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Akanksha Meyer
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita McGinty + Lindy Kastendike303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Moore
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.50
Stephanie Radlick
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Christina Nicholaou
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Christina Beverage
58W–22L career · 9 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
Megan Wyant
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Anita McGinty
73W–56L career · 11 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Mary McFarland
31W–14L career · type A · 7 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.10
Jeanne Ward
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
Gwenedd Murray
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
Leigh Rinckel
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Lindy Kastendike
72W–41L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Akanksha Meyer
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.