Teams

Flowers

2024 Leon Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-11-12vs VoorheesWon 21
W#1 DoublesRosina Cherry / Julie Espy vs Brenda Jahn / Susan Ault1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Cooper / Sally Davis vs Mariela Bartens / Linda Huffman6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTeresa Ransom / Jennifer Ungru vs Denise Whitlock / Elizabeth Norregaard4-6, 3-6
2024-11-05vs SirianniLost 01
L#2 DoublesTeresa Ransom / Rosina Cherry vs Susan Ragsdale / Marybeth Fink3-6, 2-6
2024-10-29vs Leon/Marino/18&Over6.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Espy / Karen Devorace vs Suzanne Pridgeon / Lauren Javanmardi6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Cooper / Kimberly Curry vs Mary Vanlandingham / Nicole Watson2-6, 1-6
2024-10-15vs VoorheesLost 02
L#1 DoublesCatherine Cooper / Sally Davis vs Alison Voorhees / Melissa Powell2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChristelle Roper / Mary MacKo vs Brenda Jahn / Claire Chiara6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-08vs SirianniWon 20
W#2 DoublesJulie Espy / Jan Murdock vs Mayra Zimmerman / Debbie Hall7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTeresa Ransom / Mary MacKo vs Kimberly Cramer / Kristen Knapp6-2, 6-0
2024-10-01vs Leon/Marino/18&Over6.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Cooper / Jan Murdock vs Farra Noel / Amy Cade3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Espy / Vilma Quant vs Mary Vanlandingham / Andrea Gale6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Smith / Mary MacKo vs Arianna Fernandez / Lauren Javanmardi4-6, 6-7
2024-09-17vs VoorheesLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Cooper / Sally Davis vs Brenda Jahn / Susan Ault1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTeresa Ransom / Kimberly Curry vs Elizabeth Norregaard / Melissa Powell3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary MacKo / Karen Devorace vs Linda Huffman / Suzanne Heidepriem6-7, 2-6
2024-09-10vs SirianniLost 02
L#1 DoublesJan Murdock / Julie Espy vs Mayra Zimmerman / Susan Emmanuel6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Devorace / Catherine Cooper vs Kimberly Cramer / Susan Ragsdale4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-09-03vs Leon/Marino/18&Over6.5WSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTeresa Ransom / Kimberly Curry vs Mary Vanlandingham / Nicole Watson6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Smith / Mary MacKo vs Deborah Beers / Priscilla Bailey-Brown6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Julie Espy
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.22
Catherine Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Carson Parker
published 3.5
3.18
Rosina Cherry
published
3.11
Teresa Ransom
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.11
Christelle Roper
published 3.5
2.98
Kimberly Curry
published
2.67
Vilma Quant
published
Jan Murdock
published
Karen Devorace
published
Mary MacKo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robyn Flowers
published
Sally Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Cooper + Julie Espy13953% games+2.9% vs expected
Mary MacKo + Teresa Ransom3259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Julie Espy
146W–128L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Catherine Cooper
128W–131L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Carson Parker
17W–18L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Rosina Cherry
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
Teresa Ransom
44W–55L career · 7 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Christelle Roper
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.11
Kimberly Curry
19W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
Vilma Quant
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
2.67
Jan Murdock
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Devorace
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary MacKo
81W–69L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robyn Flowers
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sally Davis
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.