Teams

Yadkin/Lawson/OT/40+4.0 Day

2025 Yadkin Valley Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women Monday morning

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-05vs Yadkin/Bettinger/40+ 4.0 DayWon 41
W#1 DoublesAmy Lawson / Beth Budd vs Mary Batts / Tammie Hughes6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesOona O'Neill vs Elisabeth Kraska4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMargot Beach / Sara Cannon vs Angela McGinn / Jennifer Jacobs2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGaines Douglas / Brandi Jacques vs Anne Benda / Laura Vary6-4, 6-4
L#4 DoublesElizabeth Hollan / Jennifer Bryan vs Stephanie Bettinger / Ann Evans0-6, 1-6
2025-03-31vs Yadkin/Mays/40+4.0 DayLost 23
L#1 DoublesAmy Lawson / Jennifer Baker vs Christina Rush / Heather Parr2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesOona O'Neill vs Courtney Penley6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKatie Thompson / Mary Reid vs Jennifer Mays / Bridget Gislimberti4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSara Cannon / Gaines Douglas vs Melissa Beeson / Jayne Johnston4-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesScottie Neill / Beth Budd vs Mimi Cartee / Lindsay Reynolds6-2, 6-3
2025-03-03vs Yadkin/Bettinger/40+ 4.0 DaySplit 22
L#1 DoublesKatie Thompson / Scottie Neill vs Angela McGinn / Marla Barnwell6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Reid / Gaines Douglas vs Carole Albright / Kathy Pace4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSara Cannon / Brandi Jacques vs Elisabeth Kraska / Stephanie Bettinger5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesElizabeth Hollan / Jennifer Bryan vs Jennifer Jacobs / Tammie Hughes7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Monday morning have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Scottie Neill
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Beth Budd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Amy Lawson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Margot Beach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Gaines Douglas
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.56
Oona O'Neill
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.30
Mary Reid
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
Katie Thompson
published
Brandi Jacques
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Jennifer Bryan
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Elizabeth Hollan
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Reid + Gaines Douglas6456% games+8.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Hollan + Mary Reid224 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Hollan + Jennifer Bryan213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Lawson + Margot Beach123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scottie Neill
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Beth Budd
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Amy Lawson
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Margot Beach
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Gaines Douglas
38W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.62
Oona O'Neill
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
Mary Reid
24W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Katie Thompson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Brandi Jacques
19W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Bryan
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Elizabeth Hollan
14W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%55%<1%
3.02
Leslie Branch Bloodworth
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.