Teams

Weinheimer

2021 18&Over Mixed · 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-07vs SpencerWon 10
W#2 DoublesTheresa Price / Frank Goroleski vs Jason Spencer / Paige Patterson6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2021-04-11vs Bing: Net HackersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Orr / Paulette Weinheimer vs Matthew Sullivan / Alex Vizgaitis6-4, 6-4
2021-03-14vs Syr: Wilcox/PittsLost 01
L#3 DoublesMia Hayes / James Orr vs Jill Pitts / Jeffrey Lonczak5-7, 2-6
2021-03-14vs Syr: Wilcox/PittsLost 01
L#3 DoublesMia Hayes / James Orr vs Jill Pitts / Jeffrey Lonczak4-6, 1-6
2021-03-14vs SpencerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesFrank Goroleski / Theresa Price vs Shwetank Rana / Paige Patterson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDaniel Williams / Kelly Greene vs Jason Spencer / Emily Esther2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-02-28vs Bing: Net HackersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Greene / James Orr vs Alex Vizgaitis / Matthew Sullivan4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPaulette Weinheimer / Daniel Williams vs Yelena Reporyeva / Ben Gonzalez7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2021-02-21vs SpencerWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Orr / Susan Vail vs Jonathon O'Hora / Paige Patterson6-2, 6-4
2021-01-24vs Bing: Net HackersLost 01
L#3 DoublesFrank Goroleski / Theresa Price vs Michelle Porterfield / Matthew Sullivan1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bing: Net Hackers6115614151
2Weinheimer3311720155
3Spencer1641737238

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Mia Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.82
Joseph Hommel
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Theresa Price
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Paulette Weinheimer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Frank Goroleski
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
James Orr
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.67
Daniel Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Tracy Sladish
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Susan Vail
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Kelly Greene
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Goroleski + Theresa Price15850% games+5.5% vs expected
Paulette Weinheimer + James Orr20855% games+1.7% vs expected
Mia Hayes + James Orr4641% gamesnot enough data
Frank Goroleski + Tracy Sladish2344% gamesnot enough data
Paulette Weinheimer + Daniel Williams224 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Price + James Orr224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Vail + Daniel Williams033 matchesnot enough data
Mia Hayes + Joseph Hommel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mia Hayes
35W–39L career · 5 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
4.22
Joseph Hommel
38W–22L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Theresa Price
135W–93L career · 8 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.79
Paulette Weinheimer
70W–57L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Frank Goroleski
27W–25L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
James Orr
23W–12L career · type M · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Daniel Williams
42W–31L career · 2 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
Tracy Sladish
71W–95L career · 6 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.62
4
Susan Vail
65W–70L career · 5 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.60
Kelly Greene
19W–25L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.