Teams

Johnson, Mackenzie

2025 Team Singles-JXN · Women 2.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-21vs Bayati, MitraLost 02
L#1 SinglesMackenzie Johnson vs Cece Sherrod3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAvery Nash vs Stephanie Bailey1-6, 2-6
2025-12-07vs Taylor, AlyssaLost 12
L#1 SinglesMonique Holmes vs Devan Bucklew0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMeredith Renfrow vs Alyssa Taylor6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesKayla Soukup vs Mary Kennedy Hand2-6, 0-6
2025-11-23vs Shaw, LisaWon 21
W#1 SinglesMonique Holmes vs Emilie Lynn6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKayla Soukup vs Deborah Hairston6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesAvery Nash vs Sue Werre4-6, 2-6
2025-11-16vs Taylor, AlyssaLost 03
L#1 SinglesSallie Dier vs Devan Bucklew0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMeredith Renfrow vs Leigh Lloyd0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMelissa Kaye Mccombs vs Alyssa Taylor1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-11-02vs Bayati, MitraLost 03
L#1 SinglesMelissa Kaye Mccombs vs Kaiti Stewart0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMonique Holmes vs BRITTANY MORALES1-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesMackenzie Johnson vs Stephanie Bailey5-7, 1-6
2025-10-26vs Shaw, LisaWon 21
W#1 SinglesMelissa Kaye Mccombs vs Ricka Hill6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesMackenzie Johnson vs Kym Gore2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesAvery Nash vs Emilie Lynn6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Taylor, Alyssa43111022153
2Johnson, Mackenzie2451326179
3Shaw, Lisa2571429201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Monique Holmes
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.43
Mackenzie Johnson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.42
Melissa Kaye Mccombs
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.31
Meredith Renfrow
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Avery Nash
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.14
Kayla Soukup
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Sallie Dier
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monique Holmes
21W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Mackenzie Johnson
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.43
Melissa Kaye Mccombs
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%73%27%
2.42
Meredith Renfrow
20W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Avery Nash
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kayla Soukup
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Sallie Dier
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.