Teams

HU - Counter

2026 USTA League Adult 55 & Over - Spring - HSV · 4.0 Men 55N3D

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-04-15vs Lee 4.0 55+Won 20
W#1 DoublesGreg Clark / David Harbarger vs Michael Lee / Blake Herrin6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Smith / Tom Snoddy vs Tim Bishop / Paul Carothers6-2, 6-0
2026-04-10vs Palmer 4.0 55+ Spring 2026Won 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Grace / Craig Satterfeal vs DANIEL FRITH / Charles Abney6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesGreg Clark / Robert Pensa vs Kerwin Wade / Jeff Tate6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMark Sommers / Harold Phillips vs Andrew Plankenhorn / Michael Little6-3, 6-4
2026-04-04vs Lee 4.0 55+Won 20
W#1 DoublesPatton Watson / Craig Satterfeal vs Tim Bishop / Jon Scallan6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMark Sommers / John Smith vs Michael Lee / Karl King6-2, 6-1
2026-04-02vs Palmer 4.0 55+ Spring 2026Won 30
W#1 DoublesTom Snoddy / Greg Clark vs Ray Palmer / James Steele6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Grace / David Harbarger vs Jeff Tate / Chuck Potter6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohn Smith / Mark Sommers vs Andrew Plankenhorn / Perry Baker6-0, 6-4
2026-03-25vs Lee 4.0 55+Won 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Smith / Patton Watson vs Michael Lee / Tim Bishop6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMark Sommers / Boyd Berryhill vs Blake Herrin / Gary Stephens6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-23vs Palmer 4.0 55+ Spring 2026Won 30
W#1 DoublesTom Snoddy / Craig Satterfeal vs Fredrick Jefferson / Kerwin Wade6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Harbarger / Robert Pensa vs Andrew Plankenhorn / James Steele7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDouglas Counter / Patton Watson vs Chuck Potter / Perry Baker6-3, 6-4
2026-03-18vs Lee 4.0 55+Won 30
W#1 DoublesGreg Clark / Robert Pensa vs Tim Bishop / Jon Scallan6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTom Snoddy / Patton Watson vs Andrew Devine / Blake Herrin6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBoyd Berryhill / John Grace vs Gary Stephens / Peter Weiland6-2, 6-1
2026-03-12vs Palmer 4.0 55+ Spring 2026Won 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Grace / David Harbarger vs DANIEL FRITH / Jeff Tate6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDouglas Counter / Tom Snoddy vs Ray Palmer / Perry Baker6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCraig Satterfeal / Mark Sommers vs Michael Little / Byron Todd6-0, 7-6
2026-03-08vs Lee 4.0 55+Won 20
W#1 DoublesPatton Watson / John Smith vs Paul Carothers / Karl King6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Harbarger / Mark Sommers vs Peter Weiland / Andrew Devine6-1, 6-1
2026-03-01vs Palmer 4.0 55+ Spring 2026Won 30
W#1 DoublesRobert Pensa / Greg Clark vs Charles Abney / Kerwin Wade6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Smith / Craig Satterfeal vs Ray Palmer / Mike McCann6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Grace / Boyd Berryhill vs Jeff Tate / Byron Todd7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Men 55N3D
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HU - Counter1002825123
2Palmer 4.0 55+ Spring 202637102042286
3Lee 4.0 55+2872350320

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Greg Clark
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.92
Craig Satterfeal
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.85
Tom Snoddy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.78
Mark Sommers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
John Grace
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.71
Patton Watson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.69
Robert Pensa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Douglas Counter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Boyd Berryhill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Snoddy + Robert Pensa5062% games+7.7% vs expected
Robert Pensa + Greg Clark10361% games+2.6% vs expected
Tom Snoddy + Douglas Counter5354% games+0.3% vs expected
Craig Satterfeal + Mark Sommers5259% games−7.0% vs expected
John Grace + Boyd Berryhill5259% gamesnot enough data
John Grace + Robert Pensa2347% gamesnot enough data
Tom Snoddy + John Grace213 matchesnot enough data
Tom Snoddy + Greg Clark303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Greg Clark
64W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.98
4
Craig Satterfeal
73W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.92
Tom Snoddy
63W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.85
Mark Sommers
28W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
John Grace
53W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Patton Watson
60W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Robert Pensa
41W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
Douglas Counter
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Boyd Berryhill
31W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.