← Teams

CGM-Kropp

2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Sarah Kaufman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Karen Pickering
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.27
Andrea Kropp
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Karl Kropp
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
—
Rolf Ellingsen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Heidi Kjos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.63
Shelley Hutley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
David Smiley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results8 ties
2019-12-07Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAndrea Kropp / Mike Rebar vs Terry Mettler / Jason Dortch6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / Sarah Kaufman vs Joe Warner / Barbara Dusicka3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Smiley / Shelley Hutley vs Neville Mehta / Laura Maginnis6-2, 6-2
2019-11-23Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesDavid Smiley / Karen Pickering vs Kathleen Budnick / Paul Best6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKarl Kropp / Andrea Kropp vs Marianne Conroy / Benjamin Brewer6-1, 6-2
2019-11-23Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesAndrew Geisler / Andrea Kropp vs Jason Fitzgerald / Debbie Frankel6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKarl Kropp / Karen Pickering vs Adam Forest / Carla Scott6-1, 7-5
2019-11-16Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / Sarah Kaufman vs Lia Irvin / Austin Martinez6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesShelley Hutley / Mike Rebar vs Lyudmila Leissler / Stefano Cavallucci6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesHeidi Kjos / David Smiley vs Annette Hill / James Harlan4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2019-11-09Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / Shelley Hutley vs William DelPlato / Liz DelPlato7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Pickering / David Smiley vs Janine Wood / Anthony Guzzi6-1, 6-4
2019-10-20Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / Sarah Kaufman vs Anne Lang / Kirk Planck5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShelley Hutley / Andrew Geisler vs Gazi Islam / Karen Dellinger6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKarl Kropp / Andrea Kropp vs Yuehai Liang / Flor Harrigan6-2, 6-1
2019-09-29Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesKaren Pickering / Mike Rebar vs Kim Christensen / Bill Christensen6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHeidi Kjos / David Smiley vs Chrys Culver / Greg Culver6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2019-09-14Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesKaren Pickering / David Smiley vs Jeanette Thomas / Matthew Casimo4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrew Geisler / Sarah Kaufman vs Kristin Eckelman / Jeffrey Bayless6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrea Kropp / Karl Kropp vs Catherine Leedy / Dave Hall6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Sarah Kaufman
31W–12L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Karen Pickering
156W–123L career
0%95%5%
3.42
3.5
Andrea Kropp
51W–81L career
0%99%0%
3.27
3.5
Karl Kropp
11W–28L career
4%94%2%
3.25
3.5
Rolf Ellingsen
43W–38L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Heidi Kjos
74W–115L career
14%86%0%
3.09
3
Shelley Hutley
15W–58L career
8%92%0%
2.63
0
David Smiley
19W–35L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.