Teams

LA - The Dream Team

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY - LA · LA - Women 4.0 WD

14 players · average NTRP 4.10 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Klingenberg / Lupe Lopez vs Krista Bissell / Jenny Ratkovich4-6, 5-7
2023-04-05vs LA - MountainGate GatorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Klingenberg / Lupe Lopez vs Jill Koenig / Christy Feinfield6-1, 6-1
2023-03-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesKimberly Branscome / Julie Woolenberg vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-06vs LA - TerminettersSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLeslie Gilbert-Lurie / Lupe Lopez vs Carrel Hoffman / Sondra Zionts6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmelia Bolker / Kimberly Branscome vs Maria Rose / Rae Bochco6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2023-02-06vs LA-LLW-Vermonsters-Karen VidalWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Klingenberg / Lupe Lopez vs Mikaela Nagler / Judy Scheer6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-01-31vs LA - TerminettersWon 10
W#2 DoublesLupe Lopez / Leslie Gilbert-Lurie vs Jordan Shapiro / Stephanie Meyer3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Danelle Geller
published 4
3.93
Lisa Klingenberg
published
3.90
Kelly Nielson
published 4.5
3.90
Stacie Smiley
published 4.5
Allison Berkley
published 4
3.72
Krisha Garvey
published
3.69
Julie Woolenberg
published
3.63
Lupe Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.61
Nicola Kerner
published
3.44
3.40
Kimberly Branscome
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Maureen Rowles
published
Suzy Nyhus
published
Wendy Marcus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Klingenberg + Danelle Geller21364% games+3.6% vs expected
Kelly Nielson + Stacie Smiley562358% games+2.4% vs expected
Julie Woolenberg + Kimberly Branscome2446% games−8.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danelle Geller
28W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
4.01
Lisa Klingenberg
25W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.93
4.5
Kelly Nielson
67W–30L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
3.90
4.5
Stacie Smiley
81W–36L career · no lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
3.90
4
Allison Berkley
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Krisha Garvey
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
Julie Woolenberg
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Lupe Lopez
149W–105L career · 5 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
Nicola Kerner
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Leslie Gilbert-Lurie
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Kimberly Branscome
31W–47L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.40
Maureen Rowles
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Suzy Nyhus
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wendy Marcus
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.