Teams

Sargent/McKeown/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.5 Men - Sunday Daytime

17 players · average NTRP 4.45 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-10vs Ternes/Bates/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesAli Murad / Daniel Schafer vs Mateus Fairbairn / Javier Saez4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMark Sargent vs Alessandro Iriu3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJames Fong / Spartacus Crawford vs Jacob Parrish / Brock Hurston6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2026-05-03vs Ternes/Bates/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesMichael McKeown / Mark Sargent vs Kory Craighead / Charlie Sevier2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDanny Nelson vs Jacob Parrish0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Grimes / James Fong vs Mateus Fairbairn / Austin Racine1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesDoug Story vs Bradley Ternes5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesConnor Malchow / Spartacus Crawford vs Erick Hale / Charles Hawkins6-3, 6-2
2026-04-26vs Ternes/Bates/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesConnor Malchow / James Fong vs Michael Yokosuk / Erick Hale4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDaniel Oxford vs Bradley Ternes6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatthew Bulow / Edmund Sauer vs Kory Craighead / Brock Hurston7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMichael McKeown vs Mateus Fairbairn2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDoug Story / Robert Grimes vs Jake Ward / Charles Hawkins6-7, 3-6
2026-04-12vs Ternes/Bates/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesJames Fong / Spartacus Crawford vs Jake Ward / Charlie Sevier2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCharles McCray vs Tyler Strong7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDoug Story / Edmund Sauer vs Erick Hale / Christopher Bates7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMatthew Bulow vs Jacob Parrish2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMark Sargent / Danny Nelson vs Bradley Ternes / Javier Saez2-6, 3-6
2026-03-29vs Ternes/Bates/NashvilleLost 14
W#1 DoublesConnor Malchow / James Fong vs Javier Saez / Charles Hawkins6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMesa Carlson vs Bradley Ternes2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael McKeown / Igor Shalkevich vs Kory Craighead / Jake Ward4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesEdmund Sauer vs Mateus Fairbairn6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDoug Story / Daniel Schafer vs Christopher Bates / Alessandro Iriu4-6, 5-7
2026-03-22vs Ternes/Bates/NashvilleLost 23
W#1 DoublesRyan Hitt / Mesa Carlson vs Mateus Fairbairn / Charles Hawkins6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCharles McCray vs Austin Racine1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSpartacus Crawford / Daniel Schafer vs Christopher Bates / Jacob Parrish3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesEdmund Sauer vs Bradley Ternes7-5, 3-3
W#3 DoublesDaniel Oxford / Doug Story vs Michael Yokosuk / Erick Hale6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men - Sunday Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Edmund Sauer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.36
Daniel Oxford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.31
Connor Malchow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.30
Charles McCray
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Ryan Hitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.29
Mesa Carlson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.27
Doug Story
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
Ali Murad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Danny Nelson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.22
Daniel Schafer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Spartacus Crawford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.15
James Fong
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.14
Michael McKeown
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.07
Robert Grimes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.06
Igor Shalkevich
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.82
Mark Sargent
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Matthew Bulow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael McKeown + Mark Sargent2343% games+5.2% vs expected
Robert Grimes + Doug Story3352% games−1.6% vs expected
Spartacus Crawford + Connor Malchow224 matchesnot enough data
Robert Grimes + Igor Shalkevich044 matchesnot enough data
Michael McKeown + Daniel Schafer314 matchesnot enough data
Michael McKeown + Igor Shalkevich224 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Oxford + Ryan Hitt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Edmund Sauer
5W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Daniel Oxford
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Connor Malchow
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Charles McCray
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
Ryan Hitt
17W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
Mesa Carlson
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Doug Story
16W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Ali Murad
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Danny Nelson
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Daniel Schafer
8W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
4.22
Spartacus Crawford
7W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
James Fong
7W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
4.15
Michael McKeown
20W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
4.14
Robert Grimes
8W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Igor Shalkevich
29W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
4.06
Mark Sargent
9W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.82
Matthew Bulow
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.