Teams

LATA18/SMITH/LCTC

2025 Combo 18 & Over-STA · Adult Women - 5.5

14 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-17vs LATA18/Jeffcoat/CAMPLost 03
L#1 DoublesApril Holt / Jody Britt vs Molly Price / Morgan Sweeney3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSusan Brown / Tracie Ifkovits vs Anne Belue / Chrissy Boone0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Phipps / Beth Hunter vs Becky Piper / Annagrace Jeffcoat0-6, 1-6
2025-08-17vs LATA18/Nunnery/QVLost 03
L#1 DoublesJody Britt / Katherine Kweder vs Reka Corley / Jamie Fite1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTorry Dickey / Sonya Head vs Jeanie Farmer / Fran Eleazer6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTracie Ifkovits / Madison Crossland vs Tammy Howard / Donna Money1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Patty Spires
published
2.85
April Holt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Tracie Ifkovits
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Torry Dickey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Sarah Mayle
published
2.69
Marketa Kubickova
published
2.65
Jody Britt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Christine Bowman
published 2.5
2.35
Beth Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.34
Laurie Phipps
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Sonya Head
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Cindy Smith
published 2.5
Katherine Kweder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Madison Crossland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracie Ifkovits + Marketa Kubickova314 matchesnot enough data
Jody Britt + Torry Dickey213 matchesnot enough data
Torry Dickey + Patty Spires303 matchesnot enough data
Beth Hunter + Tracie Ifkovits123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patty Spires
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
April Holt
26W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
Tracie Ifkovits
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
Torry Dickey
18W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Sarah Mayle
10W–18L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Marketa Kubickova
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Jody Britt
25W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
2.5
Christine Bowman
19W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%32%68%
2.57
3
Beth Hunter
11W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.35
Laurie Phipps
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Sonya Head
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.33
2.5
Cindy Smith
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Kweder
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Madison Crossland
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.