Teams

BGibson (WSRC)

2025 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Men - Tues PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-29vs MMerkel (Queens)Won 20
W#1 SinglesMAGESH ARUMUGAM vs Greg Bartell6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKen Klug / Brad Lucas vs Troy Owens / Wynn Walker6-1, 6-0
2025-04-22vs PTighe (Blakeney)Won 20
W#1 DoublesDana Haake / Ken Klug vs Rodney Myers / Kelly Stone6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMAGESH ARUMUGAM vs Harry Werner6-0, 6-0
2025-04-08vs HMahgoub (PCC)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMAGESH ARUMUGAM vs Brian Burnett3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-01vs RWilliamson (JCC)Split 11
W#1 SinglesMAGESH ARUMUGAM vs Ron Hunte6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTano Failla / Neil Atkins vs Kevin Woods / Jeff Weiss2-6, 4-6
2025-03-25vs MHenninger (Raintree)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMAGESH ARUMUGAM vs Nevin Sheppard2-6, 0-6
2025-03-18vs MReishman (OPRC)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesMAGESH ARUMUGAM vs John Nurkin1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTano Failla / Graham Phillips vs Amin Mehrizi / Ljubomir Stambuk4-6, 1-6
2025-03-11vs MMerkel (Queens)Won 20
W#1 SinglesMAGESH ARUMUGAM vs Greg Bartell6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTano Failla / Graham Phillips vs Jarrod Pafford / John Cantrell6-1, 7-6
2025-03-04Won 10
W#1 SinglesMAGESH ARUMUGAM vs Nitin Agrawal6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Dana Haake
published 3.5
3.10
Dwayne Trantham
published
3.01
Tano Failla
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.00
Graham Phillips
published
2.99
Ken Klug
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Bruce Gibson
published 3
2.88
Neil Atkins
published
2.87
George Koskinas
published
2.84
MAGESH ARUMUGAM
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Brad Lucas
published 3
2.61
Brad Fellers
published 3
2.60
Walter Harfmann
published
George VanDyne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruce Gibson + George Koskinas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Haake
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Dwayne Trantham
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
3
Tano Failla
53W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Graham Phillips
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Ken Klug
101W–84L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Bruce Gibson
29W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Neil Atkins
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
George Koskinas
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
MAGESH ARUMUGAM
70W–53L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Brad Lucas
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Brad Fellers
1W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Walter Harfmann
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
George VanDyne
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.