Teams

HOF: Tennis Mania/Gwizdowski/Morrison

2023 RI Adult 55 & Over Men · 7.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-14vs CC: Wed Night Guys/Marrin/McGwinWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoshua Bell / Jonathan Bell vs Donald Marrin / Scott Martin6-4, 6-2
2023-08-09vs CC: Wed Night Guys/Marrin/McGwinLost 01
L#1 DoublesRoger Scholl / Rick Sticca vs Donald Marrin / David Axelson4-6, 4-6
2023-08-02vs RP: MaggiacomoLost 01
L#1 DoublesRick Sticca / Steve Morin vs Edward Maggiacomo / Richard Boyce4-6, 3-6
2023-07-11vs FC: Travers/PlataLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Gwizdowski / Charles Albrecht vs Kenneth Savatdy / Stu Yang2-6, 3-6
2023-06-25vs RP: MaggiacomoLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoshua Bell / Jonathan Bell vs Manny Pacheco / Stephen Collins4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRick Sticca / David Gwizdowski vs Edward Maggiacomo / Richard Boyce1-6, 6-4, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Albrecht / Robert Crooks vs Peter B Miller / Douglas Gray1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOF: Tennis Mania/Gwizdowski/Morrison0721940251
2FC: Travers/Plata0818614164
3RP: Maggiacomo0818616168
4CC: Wed Night Guys/Marrin/McGwin08121225213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Charles Albrecht
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Rick Sticca
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
David Gwizdowski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jonathan Bell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joshua Bell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Vitor Fellows
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Bell + Joshua Bell8654% games−2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charles Albrecht
14W–16L career · type M · 2 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.18
Rick Sticca
18W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3
David Gwizdowski
20W–38L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Jonathan Bell
19W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joshua Bell
75W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Vitor Fellows
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.