Teams

Bradenton Tennis Center (United) Apple

2021 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Weekday · 4.0 W Tuesday

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-14vs Sarasota - Longwood Wilson-SnyderLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynn Inganamort / Robyn Rhodes vs Donna Hannigan / Nancy Cope6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2021-05-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly LaLima / Robyn Rhodes vs Lori Campbell / Annthonia Prossi5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-18vs Cedars SuperstarsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKimberly Johnston / Kimberly LaLima vs Claire Speir / Manda Jordan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCherie Lopez / Robyn Rhodes vs Mary Jane Waite / Cynthia Norwood4-6, 3-6
2021-05-11vs Laurel's Sassy LassiesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKimberly Johnston / Kimberly LaLima vs Joyce Weiss / Tanya Keith6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobyn Rhodes / Malika Apple vs Cindy Rosenberg / Lori Lockhart6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-04vs Plantation ForsterWon 20
W#1 DoublesKimberly Johnston / Kimberly LaLima vs Cynthia Horton / Tracy Mediratta6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCherie Lopez / Robyn Rhodes vs Patricia Dipierro / Lesli Andrews6-1, 6-4
2021-04-27vs River Strand Hit and RunLost 02
L#1 DoublesJudith Lubbers / Robyn Rhodes vs Judi Wilson / Sharyn Quiros6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSandra Cook / Kimberly LaLima vs Kara Beene / Hattie Grimsley2-6, 2-6
2021-04-23vs LWR NicholsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJudith Lubbers / Robyn Rhodes vs Sheila Perry / Gina Hagopian6-4, 7-5
2021-04-13vs LWR Game.Set.Lunch.Won 20
W#1 DoublesMalika Apple / Judith Lubbers vs Andrea Deitch / Claudia Schwab6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRobyn Rhodes / Cherie Lopez vs Donna Dubinsky / Lu Circelli6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2021-04-06vs Mission Valley MooneySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJudith Lubbers / Malika Apple vs Brenda Hibbeln / Sandra Mooney4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCherie Lopez / Robyn Rhodes vs Patricia Moriarty / Halle Ghose6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Kimberly LaLima
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.72
Judith Lubbers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Ashley Galvin
published 3.5
3.16
Barbara Mire
published 3.5
Lynn Inganamort
published
Robyn Rhodes
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Lubbers + Robyn Rhodes8458% games+3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly LaLima
72W–31L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Judith Lubbers
220W–129L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Ashley Galvin
33W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Barbara Mire
4W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
Lynn Inganamort
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Robyn Rhodes
71W–75L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.