Teams

Bahorski

2024 Leon Adult 40 & Over · 4.0W Adult 40 & Over

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-03-28vs WarnerLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathy Beggs / Elizabeth Hawkins vs Jennifer Britt / Michelle Eubanks1-6, 5-7
2024-03-14vs KjellerupLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Carey / Kathy Beggs vs Lori Elliott / Susan Goodwin4-6, 1-6
2024-03-07vs WarnerLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Carey / Kathy Beggs vs Lisa Franson / Anna Jones1-6, 2-6
2024-02-08vs WarnerLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Beggs / Susan Carey vs Anna Jones / Lisa Graganella4-6, 2-6
2024-02-06vs KjellerupLost 01
L#1 SinglesKathy Beggs vs Fang Liang2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Catherine Reid
published 4
3.77
Elizabeth Murray
published
3.71
Kathy Beggs
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.57
Pia Lehtonen
published
3.52
Jennifer Winegardner
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.44
Jennifer Larson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Beggs + Jennifer Larson7750% games+5.1% vs expected
Jennifer Larson + Jennifer Winegardner2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Reid
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Elizabeth Murray
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Kathy Beggs
55W–60L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Pia Lehtonen
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Jennifer Winegardner
195W–211L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
Jennifer Larson
81W–99L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.