Teams

Huntington

2022 Anne Arundel Adult Other Women's Day · Anne Arundel Adult Other Women's Day 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-31vs AppelLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Huntington / Sarah Worcester vs Anh Le / Lisa Walsh2-6, 5-7
2022-03-29vs WoffordWon 10
W#2 DoublesJill Huntington / Sumiyo McShea vs Dale Clark / Cynthia Wofford6-1, 6-2
2022-03-15vs WoffordWon 20
W#1 DoublesYulin Henry / Patricia Lopez vs Dale Clark / Sherri Raimondo6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJill Huntington / Sarah Worcester vs Cynthia Wofford / Nancy McGee6-0, 6-4
2022-03-10vs AppelWon 10
W#2 DoublesJill Huntington / Yulin Henry vs Marina Anglim / Tracy Seybert6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-22vs WoffordWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill Huntington / Karen Adriani vs Dale Clark / Ruth Popp7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesYulin Henry / Sumiyo McShea vs Michelle O'Brien / Sherri Raimondo7-6, 1-0
2022-02-17vs AppelSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Adriani / Jill Huntington vs Anh Le / Jennifer Coady1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesYulin Henry / Sumiyo McShea vs Marina Anglim / Sophia Crawley6-2, 6-4
2022-02-01vs WoffordWon 10
W#1 DoublesYulin Henry / Patricia Lopez vs Dale Clark / Michelle O'Brien2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-01-27vs AppelSplit 11
L#1 DoublesYulin Henry / Babette Poyer vs Jennifer Coady / Anh Le3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJill Huntington / Karen Adriani vs Lisa Walsh / Heather Nesti6-3, 7-5
2022-01-11vs WoffordWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Huntington / Sumiyo McShea vs Julie Grignon / Sherri Raimondo7-5, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult Other Women's Day 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Jill Huntington
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.88
Karen Casey
published
2.73
Karen Adriani
published
2.68
Sarah Worcester
published
2.67
Kathy Hastings
published
2.64
Yulin Henry
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.54
Patricia Lopez
published
2.44
Rise Lancoon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yulin Henry + Jill Huntington3353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jill Huntington
206W–137L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%14%86%
3.14
Karen Casey
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Karen Adriani
0W–11L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%0%
2.73
Sarah Worcester
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
Kathy Hastings
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Yulin Henry
182W–192L career · 10 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
Patricia Lopez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
Rise Lancoon
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.