Teams

Conrad/Memphis

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 2.5 18 & Over Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.36
Mary-Grace Gentry
published
2.33
Sarah Conrad
published
2.27
Mary Anne Pohlman
published
Chantall Jenkins
published 2.5
Danielle Montesi
published 2.5
2.19
Allison Cleeton
published 2.5
2.17
Laura Connerley
published
2.06
Tressa Ogles
published
2.05
Emily D Folk
published
1.93
Amanda Ricketts
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tressa Ogles + Mary Anne Pohlman2336% gamesnot enough data
Mary-Grace Gentry + Allison Cleeton224 matchesnot enough data
Allison Cleeton + Mary Anne Pohlman224 matchesnot enough data
Emily D Folk + Sarah Conrad123 matchesnot enough data
Mary-Grace Gentry + Sarah Conrad123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary-Grace Gentry
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
Sarah Conrad
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Mary Anne Pohlman
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Chantall Jenkins
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Danielle Montesi
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Allison Cleeton
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Laura Connerley
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Tressa Ogles
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Emily D Folk
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Amanda Ricketts
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.