Teams

Midtown/Perez

2025 Broward Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Adult 40 & Over Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.70 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-01vs PioneerP/RamsinghWon 20
W#1 DoublesCatharine Utvich / Zareen Khimani vs Rose Cortez / Natasha Ramsingh6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesClaudia Low vs Cynthia Thomas6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2025-03-13vs Broward/Serpas/40&Over2.5WLost 01
L#1 SinglesCatharine Utvich vs Daniela Abad2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-03-06vs PioneerP/RamsinghLost 02
L#1 DoublesCatharine Utvich / Lucienne Skalski de Campos vs Ana Teresa Ledgard / Angela Portal7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAdriana Perez / Claudia Low vs Natasha Ramsingh / Bridget Cecil3-6, 3-6
2025-03-04vs PioneerP/RamsinghSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLaura Curi vs Natasha Ramsingh6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAdriana Perez / Claudia Low vs Ana Teresa Ledgard / Shannon Wayte5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-02-20vs Broward/Serpas/40&Over2.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatricia Ballesteros / Laura Curi vs Alane Taporowski / Jennifer Rhett0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesClaudia Low vs Daniela Abad6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-01-30vs Broward/Serpas/40&Over2.5WWon 10
W#1 SinglesCatharine Utvich vs Carolina Solanilla6-3, 6-3
2025-01-23vs PioneerP/RamsinghWon 20
W#1 SinglesClaudia Low vs Cynthia Thomas6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatharine Utvich / Zareen Khimani vs Nella Rosales / Sylvia Anhalzer6-2, 7-6
2025-01-09vs Broward/Serpas/40&Over2.5WLost 01
L#1 SinglesClaudia Low vs Daniela Abad4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Laura Curi
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.35
2.32
Catharine Utvich
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.32
Zareen Khimani
published
2.25
Claudia Low
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.16
Adriana Perez
published 2.5
2.14
Alejandra Jaramillo
published 2.5
1.90
Fernanda Hirsch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adriana Perez + Alejandra Jaramillo6256% games+3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Laura Curi
53W–76L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
Lucienne Skalski de Campos
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.35
Patricia Ballesteros
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
3
Catharine Utvich
31W–51L career · 5 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.32
Zareen Khimani
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Claudia Low
24W–43L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Adriana Perez
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Alejandra Jaramillo
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
Fernanda Hirsch
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.