Teams

Fuzzy Balls

USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 3.64 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-05-02vs Sets AddictsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMonica Reagan / Tom Motherwell vs Jennifer Sukow / Jeffrey Raulston5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-26vs DomminettersWon 10
W#3 DoublesTom Motherwell / Sherri Felton vs Bill Agler / Cynthia Copple6-2, 7-6
2021-04-18vs ETC SlicersLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmanda Hanby / Adam Hanby vs Gary Loeb / Kelly Loeb2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-04-10vs Serve Aces & Limes 7.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTom Motherwell / Sherri Felton vs Andy Mehl / Trudy Fouser7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-03vs Have FunLost 02
L#2 DoublesChris Culig / Sherri Felton vs Chandra Angadi / Adair Holden1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAdam Hanby / Amanda Hanby vs Francis Fritz / Cathy Adams3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-03-30vs Guys and Dolls with BallsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSteve Elwer / Sherri Felton vs Leann Gilberg / Michael Warwick7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAdam Hanby / Amanda Hanby vs Kirk Porritt / Kathy Hansen3-6, 3-6
2021-03-21Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChris Culig / Sherri Felton vs Nicola Griebe / Brian Griebe1-6, 3-6
2021-03-20vs Baby got backhandLost 02
L#2 DoublesTom Motherwell / Sherri Felton vs Chad Trued / Chelsey Melby3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Hanby / Adam Hanby vs Molly Henrie / Tayler Henrie3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-03-14vs Beer GogglesWon 10
W#3 DoublesChris Culig / Sherri Felton vs Justin Carr / Jennifer Hoppins6-3, 6-3
2021-03-13vs Full Metal RacquetsLost 02
L#1 DoublesTom Motherwell / Monica Reagan vs John Chavez / Jennifer Mitchell4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAdam Hanby / Amanda Hanby vs Rosy Castleton / Dit Dudley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-03-07vs Sunny Day Dreamin'Won 10
W#3 DoublesTom Motherwell / Monica Reagan vs Richard Leaton / Anke Heineck6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Christine Elwer
published 4
3.59
3.46
Mark Burriesci
published 3.5
3.42
Dawn Crochet
published 3.5
3.40
Steve Elwer
published 3.5
3.35
Chris Culig
published 3.5
3.21
Dan Hart
published 3.5
3.03
Monica Reagan
published
Adam Hanby
published
Amanda Hanby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sherri Felton
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Tom Motherwell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Will Baird
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Hart + Monica Reagan12752% games+8.0% vs expected
Katheryn Burriesci + Mark Burriesci231952% games+6.4% vs expected
Christine Elwer + Steve Elwer272651% games−2.0% vs expected
Chris Culig + Dawn Crochet152246% games−7.7% vs expected
Dan Hart + Sherri Felton01629% gamesnot enough data
Monica Reagan + Tom Motherwell6458% gamesnot enough data
Chris Culig + Sherri Felton2831% gamesnot enough data
Tom Motherwell + Sherri Felton1841% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Elwer
156W–133L career · no lines in 2021
23%76%<1%
3.59
4
Katheryn Burriesci
108W–95L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Mark Burriesci
90W–53L career · no lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Dawn Crochet
170W–181L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Steve Elwer
144W–105L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Chris Culig
106W–89L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Dan Hart
112W–142L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
Monica Reagan
106W–95L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.03
Adam Hanby
5W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Amanda Hanby
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sherri Felton
46W–68L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tom Motherwell
20W–24L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Will Baird
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.