Teams

LATA40-TAYLOR-SSP

2023 Adult 40 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 3.5 - Night

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.5 - Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Caroline King
published 4
3.66
Deidre Neuberg
published 3.5
3.54
Dana Burke
published 4
3.36
Sarah Chaboya
published
3.21
Stefanie Carpenter
published
3.15
Monica Hurley
published
3.07
Brett Stevens
published 3.5
3.01
Kimberly Sox
published
2.97
Janet Buhrow
published
Laura Kane
published
Rebecca Coleman
published
Rebecca Stevenson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Coleman + Laura Kane301060% games+3.5% vs expected
Janet Buhrow + Kimberly Sox3262% games+3.3% vs expected
Caroline King + Dana Burke12360% games+3.1% vs expected
Rebecca Coleman + Brett Stevens123 matchesnot enough data
Brett Stevens + Laura Kane123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caroline King
83W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.88
3.5
Deidre Neuberg
86W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.66
4
Dana Burke
61W–28L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
Sarah Chaboya
68W–40L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Stefanie Carpenter
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
Monica Hurley
49W–68L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Brett Stevens
32W–30L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.07
Kimberly Sox
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
Janet Buhrow
52W–67L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.97
Laura Kane
99W–44L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Coleman
74W–43L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Stevenson
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.