Teams

OWB/Jimison/7.5/Women

2022 OWB Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-11-13vs Rosemary Beach-LepleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesTina Phillips / Brenda Nyberg vs Julie Larsen / Burnice Eley6-3, 6-2
2022-10-23vs Rosemary Beach-LepleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Whittle / Iman Elkomy vs Holley Hughes / Julie Larsen6-0, 6-1
2022-10-18vs Rosemary Beach-LepleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesNatacha Phillips / Mimi Conjar vs Mary Lostak / Victoria Dejoy6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTina Phillips / Jennifer Whittle vs Holley Hughes / Deborah Hollis6-2, 6-2
2022-10-11vs Rosemary Beach-LepleyWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Whittle / Iman Elkomy vs Mary Lostak / Charmayne Leard6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2022-10-09vs Rosemary Beach-LepleyWon 20
W#2 DoublesNatacha Phillips / Mimi Conjar vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTina Phillips / Brenda Nyberg vs Kim Lepley / Deborah Hollis6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Jennifer Whittle
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Natacha Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Tina Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Mimi Conjar
published
3.52
Kelly Cliett
published
3.48
Ashley Edmonds
published 4
3.44
LeAnne Shumate
published
3.44
Lindy Wood
published
3.30
Kimberly Colley
published
Deanna Jimison
published 3.5
3.24
Pamm Chapman
published
3.19
Iman Elkomy
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Phillips + Jennifer Whittle14755% games+3.8% vs expected
Natacha Phillips + Ashley Edmonds303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Whittle
53W–42L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Natacha Phillips
134W–77L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Tina Phillips
69W–42L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Mimi Conjar
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Kelly Cliett
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Ashley Edmonds
17W–9L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
LeAnne Shumate
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
Lindy Wood
21W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
Kimberly Colley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Deanna Jimison
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamm Chapman
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Iman Elkomy
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.