Teams

Garfield - Shalimar Pointe

2025 OWB Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Combo 18 & Over Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-22vs OWB/Stowers/18&Over Combo 7.5WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFlavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny / Tami Groth vs Tricia Hafdahl / Shannyn Stevenson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKassia Garfield / Megan Sherman vs Alicia Roberson / TRACY STOWERS6-2, 6-2
2025-11-16vs Maddox - Rosemary BeachWon 10
W#3 DoublesFlavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny / Tami Groth vs Julie van Kirk / Michelle Asbell6-1, 6-4
2025-11-09vs OWB/Stowers/18&Over Combo 7.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMegan Sherman / Moya Peterson vs Allison Phillips / Alicia Roberson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDianna Dylewski / Tami Groth vs TRACY STOWERS / Jolyn Curtis4-6, 0-6
2025-11-01vs Jimison - EdgewaterWon 10
W#1 DoublesDianna Dylewski / Megan Sherman vs Janet Brumley / Carrie Redd2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-10-25vs Maddox - Rosemary BeachSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDianna Dylewski / Charlotte Dunworth vs Ashley Edmonds / Lindy Wood6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesFlavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny / Meriel Donahey vs Emily King / LeAnne Shumate1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-11vs Jimison - EdgewaterWon 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Sherman / Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny vs Janet Brumley / Carrie Redd6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Deanna Chapman
published 4
3.61
Dianna Dylewski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Megan Sherman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Meriel Donahey
published
3.30
Charlotte Dunworth
published 3.5
3.27
Tami Groth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deanna Chapman + Dianna Dylewski3443% games−15.9% vs expected
Deanna Chapman + Megan Sherman314 matchesnot enough data
Deanna Chapman + Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny213 matchesnot enough data
Dianna Dylewski + Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deanna Chapman
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Dianna Dylewski
50W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny
60W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Megan Sherman
37W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.42
Meriel Donahey
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Charlotte Dunworth
3W–0L career · type A · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Tami Groth
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.