Teams

SD 2.5 Coronado TC/ Jimenez

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WD · SD - Women - 2.5 (Monday)

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-08vs SD 2.5 Peninsula TC/ WilliamsWon 21
L#1 DoublesHiroyo Poland / Victoria Surdykowski vs Helen Willink / Shannon Mcfarland6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMonica Olivares vs Linda Hastings6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrigitte Cohen / Ashton Ellis vs Erica Smith / Kathee Weisenberg6-0, 0-6, 1-0
2026-06-01vs SD 2.5 LJBTC/ FeuersteinWon 21
W#1 DoublesHiroyo Poland / Victoria Surdykowski vs Carly Feuerstein / Denise Gordon6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAshton Ellis vs Johanna Palomino6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrigitte Cohen / Stephanie McAlister vs Amy Carr / Kate Kassar1-6, 1-6
2026-05-18vs WC SD 2.5 Mtn View/ CallerosLost 12
L#1 DoublesGiovanna Jimenez / Monica Olivares vs Maritza Acuna / Suiunay Amanalieva1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBrigitte Cohen vs Liliana Rodriguez6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAshton Ellis / Hiroyo Poland vs Diana Aispuro / Ana Lucia Almada5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-11vs SD 2.5 Balboa TC/ FreedmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrigitte Cohen / Hiroyo Poland vs Echo Roben / Monique Labarre2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesGiovanna Jimenez vs Anu Venkatesh0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Olivares / Ashton Ellis vs Robin Delaney / Polina Cherevichnaya5-7, 2-6
2026-05-04vs SoCal/Blair/18&Over2.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaulina Bejarano / Monica Olivares vs Miriam Mceachern / Corrine Lott1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGiovanna Jimenez vs Cecilia Blair6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie McAlister / Hiroyo Poland vs Jessica Bunster / Jill Bruckart0-6, 1-6
2026-04-20vs WC SD 2.5 Mtn View/ CallerosLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlisa Kerr / Hiroyo Poland vs Diana Aispuro / Ana Lucia Almada3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesGiovanna Jimenez vs Maritza Acuna3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrigitte Cohen / Ashton Ellis vs Teresa Vega / Rebecca Canales6-3, 6-2
2026-04-13vs SD 2.5 Sunbow Park (2:1)/ CruzLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaulina Bejarano / Eva Szymanski vs Noor Hilmi / Samaria Cruz5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAlisa Kerr vs Arcelia Nebel4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie McAlister / Victoria Surdykowski vs Jennifer Contreras / Desiree Huynh6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-06vs SD 2.5 LJBTC/ FeuersteinWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaulina Bejarano / Giovanna Jimenez vs Kate Kassar / Johanna Palomino6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMonica Olivares vs Amy Carr2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBrigitte Cohen / Ashton Ellis vs Ashley Jacobs / Amanda Feghali6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · SD - Women - 2.5 (Monday)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SoCal/Blair/18&Over2.5W6218613154
2WC SD 2.5 Mtn View/ Calleros62141022178
3SD 2.5 Sunbow Park (2:1)/ Cruz62131128211
4SD 2.5 Balboa TC/ Freedman35111329220
5SD 2.5 Coronado TC/ Jimenez3591532226
6SD 2.5 Peninsula TC/ Williams26101431235
7SD 2.5 LJBTC/ Feuerstein2691533237

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.37
Ashton Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
2.32
Brigitte Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
2.30
Paulina Bejarano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Giovanna Jimenez
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Alisa Kerr
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.24
Victoria Surdykowski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.20
Monica Olivares
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.17
Hiroyo Poland
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
1.89
Stephanie McAlister
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Eva Szymanski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Silvia Urbina
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashton Ellis + Hiroyo Poland213 matchesnot enough data
Ashton Ellis + Brigitte Cohen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Ashton Ellis
10W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Brigitte Cohen
4W–2L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Paulina Bejarano
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
Giovanna Jimenez
6W–11L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Alisa Kerr
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Victoria Surdykowski
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Monica Olivares
7W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
Hiroyo Poland
6W–12L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Stephanie McAlister
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Eva Szymanski
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Silvia Urbina
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.