← Teams

PTC-White

2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.65 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Nate Larsen
published 4
3.75
Angie Stromquist
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.69
Nina Hanson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Ariana White
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.46
Keith Main
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Ernesto Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Ryan Manwiller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Kimberly Parks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Elizabeth Schwarz
published 3.5
2.88
Jered Cuenco
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
Results9 ties
2023-12-08Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Parks / Ryan Manwiller vs Gabriel Weaver / Emily Vander Ploeg6-2, 6-2
2023-11-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKimberly Parks / Ryan Manwiller vs Pamela Hughes / Richard Jennings6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNina Hanson / Keith Main vs Amanda Lowthian / Michael Meyers6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAriana White / Jered Cuenco vs Wendy Nakatani / Todd Khozein3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-11-18Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKimberly Parks / Ryan Manwiller vs Hayley Cottrell / Peter Hoang4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngie Stromquist / Ernesto Rodriguez vs Kimberly Stockstad / Rob Laing6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCate Harrington / Keith Main vs Stephanie Haas / Todd Carris6-1, 6-2
2023-11-12Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesAriana White / Ezra James vs Kalynn Belden / Jonathan Hong6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngie Stromquist / Ernesto Rodriguez vs Morganne Hatfield / Shane Wilson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-10-28Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesAngie Stromquist / Nate Larsen vs Kusum Mehndiratta / Fernando Bessa6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesNina Hanson / Jered Cuenco vs Cathy Gatzke / Sam Ko4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-10-21Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAriana White / Ernesto Rodriguez vs Kathryn Harlan / Tony Chennault6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKimberly Parks / Ryan Manwiller vs Julie Arness / Richard Clark6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNina Hanson / Keith Main vs Patricia Morrison / Kevin Sullivan6-2, 6-0
2023-10-14Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesKimberly Parks / Ryan Manwiller vs Megan Mandel / Roger Dehoog6-1, 6-0
2023-10-07Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKimberly Parks / Ezra James vs Alana Rhea / Charles Hahn6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAngie Stromquist / Ernesto Rodriguez vs Heidi Kjos / Mark Muckerheide6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Schwarz / Keith Main vs Sarah Kaufman / Karl Kropp6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-09-23Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesAngie Stromquist / Ezra James vs Rebecca McMasters / Devin McMasters6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Parks / Ryan Manwiller vs Sara Crate / Stephen Sanner6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nate Larsen
27W–11L career
0%99%1%
3.80
4
Angie Stromquist
92W–47L career
1%98%0%
3.75
4
Nina Hanson
110W–57L career
4%96%0%
3.69
4
Ariana White
177W–86L career
14%86%0%
3.59
3.5
Keith Main
66W–34L career
1%74%25%
3.46
3.5
Ernesto Rodriguez
34W–29L career
1%86%13%
3.41
3.5
Ryan Manwiller
37W–27L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Kimberly Parks
92W–90L career
1%98%0%
3.24
3.5
Elizabeth Schwarz
49W–46L career
17%83%0%
3.07
3
Jered Cuenco
66W–83L career
0%97%3%
2.88

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.