Teams

AWhalan (Queens)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-13vs HPhelps/Spinner (Bridgehampton)Split 11
W#1 SinglesSarah Smulktis vs Hila Johnson4-1
L#2 DoublesAnne Whalan / Sharon Storck vs HEATHER PHELPS / Melissa Spinner1-6, 3-6
2023-05-05vs LRosser/MHabegger (Park Road)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMartha Metzl / Sharon Storck vs Alice Hart / Diana Kilponen4-6, 2-6
2023-04-21vs CMcWilliams/KWainscott (OPRC)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesSarah Smulktis vs Carrie Bode6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulia Cheatwood / Sharon Storck vs Ginger Daly / Elizabeth Smart4-6, 2-6
2023-04-21Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSarah Smulktis vs Stacey Livingston6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2023-03-20vs JLocke/MMcKinstry (Raintree)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJoan Bullard / Anna Godwin vs Megan Bishop Quirk / Janis Behymer4-6, 6-7
2023-03-17vs TRichardson (Col Beatty)Won 20
W#1 SinglesSarah Smulktis vs Suzanne Jones6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSharon Storck / Anna Godwin vs Vanessa Pomfrey / Loretta Anderson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-09vs KWahr/DDipangrazio (Carmel)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Smulktis / Sharon Storck vs Marcie Elaasar / Kristine Wahr2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Lauren Thurmond
published
3.75
Sarah Smulktis
usually #1 Singles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Meaghan Richardson
published
3.66
Kathryn Martin
published
3.59
Martha Metzl
published 3.5
3.50
Anne Whalan
published 3.5
3.41
Kristina Hoops
published
3.35
Sharon Storck
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 3.5
Joan Bullard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Katherine Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Whalan + Martha Metzl11561% games+0.5% vs expected
Sharon Storck + Martha Metzl4455% games−0.6% vs expected
Sharon Storck + Sarah Smulktis314 matchesnot enough data
Anne Whalan + Kathryn Martin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Thurmond
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Sarah Smulktis
94W–46L career · 12 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
Meaghan Richardson
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Kathryn Martin
23W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.66
3.5
Martha Metzl
152W–68L career · no lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Anne Whalan
111W–68L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
Kristina Hoops
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Sharon Storck
95W–93L career · 11 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Joan Bullard
30W–65L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Katherine Smith
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.