Teams

HCC Baseline Babes - N. Borel-Saladin

2023 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-22vs Buckhorn Matchmakers - N. EvansWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Borel-Saladin / Jenni Carroll vs Danielle Cunningham / Nicole Evans7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-15vs Buckhorn Sweetspots - C. DemingWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Sayer / Sheila Calistri vs Sara Newsom / Melissa Wolczak6-0, 6-3
2023-05-08vs HCC Smoke Show - E. FlitmanLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurie Powell / Nicole Borel-Saladin vs Anne Marie Lennox / Jennifer Duglin3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesNicole Borel-Saladin / Jenni Carroll vs Karen Cleland / Theresa Mays6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesFrances Cooperwasser / Julie Sayer vs Carmen Heggen / Wei Xue6-4, 6-2
2023-04-24vs AvilaWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaurie Powell / Nicole Borel-Saladin vs Anne Stafford / Joy Themides6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Sayer / Karen Leary vs Nicole Hasselbach / Michelle Fitz-Randolph6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-04-17vs Van Dyke Farms - M. HestonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJenni Carroll / Julie Sayer vs Stephanie van Brocklin / MARY HESTON4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesNicole Borel-Saladin vs Pamela Moore6-2, 6-0
2023-04-10vs Westchase - P. HayesWon 10
W#3 DoublesNicole Borel-Saladin / Karen Leary vs Josephine Beaumont / Carmen Fiorito7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJenni Carroll / Julie Sayer vs Anne McKenna / Pamela Woodham6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Leary / Nicole Borel-Saladin vs Kate Walshcalton / Cindy Sparks6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Maria Yulee Guim
published
3.42
Julie Sayer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Devin Mequio
published 3.5
3.27
Nicole Borel-Saladin
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.05
Jenni Carroll
published
2.65
Karen Leary
published
2.49
Sheila Calistri
published
2.33
Marcia Mullis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Borel-Saladin + Julie Sayer9070% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Yulee Guim
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Julie Sayer
60W–8L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Devin Mequio
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Nicole Borel-Saladin
71W–41L career · 7 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Jenni Carroll
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.05
Karen Leary
8W–20L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
Sheila Calistri
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.49
Marcia Mullis
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.