Teams

HCC West

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-06-24Won 10
W#2 SinglesAMY LINES vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-27vs Wooklake JolinskiWon 10
W#2 DoublesAMY LINES / Blakley West vs Jenny Jolinski / Virginia Patterson6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
AMY LINES
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Betsy Kersey
published 4
3.25
Thu-Hang Groome
published
2.92
2.68
AIMEE DABNEY
published 3
2.67
Kristen Wood
published
2.66
Jennifer McGeorge
published
2.66
2.43
Amanda Core
published 2.5
2.40
Virginia Cochran
published
Monica Walsh
published
Susan Mangin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Cochran + Kristen Wood033 matchesnot enough data
Virginia Cochran + Elizabeth Jurkuta123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
220W–87L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Betsy Kersey
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Thu-Hang Groome
10W–3L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Elizabeth Wiertel
29W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
AIMEE DABNEY
13W–13L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
Kristen Wood
0W–9L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
Jennifer McGeorge
10W–11L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Elizabeth Jurkuta
6W–17L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66
2.5
Amanda Core
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
0%71%29%
2.43
Virginia Cochran
3W–8L career · no lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
2.40
Monica Walsh
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Mangin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.