Teams

MReishman (OPRC)

2025 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Men - Tues PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-05vs RWilliamson (JCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Reishman / David Markham vs Richard Williamson / Steve Lepow6-3, 6-0
2025-04-29vs HMahgoub (PCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Reishman / David Markham vs Tim Rodriguez / Richard Swanson6-4, 6-1
2025-04-15vs MHenninger (Raintree)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Reishman / Addison May vs Owen Williams / Brady Koesel6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-01vs MMerkel (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Reishman / Amin Mehrizi vs John Moritz / Jason Young7-5, 6-0
2025-03-25vs PTighe (Blakeney)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmin Mehrizi / Michael Reishman vs Rodney Myers / PATRICK TIGHE7-6, 7-6
2025-03-18vs BGibson (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Reishman / David Markham vs Dana Haake / Dwayne Trantham4-6, 2-6
2025-03-11vs HMahgoub (PCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Reishman / Ljubomir Stambuk vs Bill Hurd / Brian Daly6-3, 6-1
2025-03-04Won 10
W#1 SinglesMichael Reishman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
John Nurkin
published
3.08
David Markham
published 3.5
3.06
Michael Reishman
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.04
Carl Council
published 3
2.92
Ljubomir Stambuk
published
2.85
Glenn Brunker
published
2.76
Kevin Carlisle
published
2.75
Amin Mehrizi
published 3
Rob Eby
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amin Mehrizi + Ljubomir Stambuk224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Nurkin
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
David Markham
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.08
3
Michael Reishman
36W–33L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Carl Council
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Ljubomir Stambuk
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Glenn Brunker
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Kevin Carlisle
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Amin Mehrizi
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Rob Eby
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.