Teams

MARION/Watts

2022 Marion Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs FK - Little Shots (Centonze)Won 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Steed / Eileen Lombardo vs Barbara Slatton / Penny Terry6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTanner Watts / Debby Watts vs Hollie Powell / Dana Pine6-4, 6-1
2022-07-16vs FK - Little Shots (Centonze)Split 11
L#1 DoublesDebby Watts / Jennifer Hewitson vs Pamela Plumlee / Nancy Little3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Caroline Murray vs Natalie Slatton / Barbara Slatton6-4, 6-2
2022-07-13vs FK - Little Shots (Centonze)Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Steed / Eileen Lombardo vs Pamela Plumlee / Nancy Little6-4, 6-2
2022-06-22vs FK - Little Shots (Centonze)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Boyd / Debby Watts vs Barbara Slatton / Natalie Slatton6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Steed / Eileen Lombardo vs Andrea Harden / Leigh McPherson6-3, 6-3
2022-06-20vs FK - Little Shots (Centonze)Split 11
L#1 DoublesDebby Watts / Jennifer Boyd vs Pamela Plumlee / Nancy Little2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Amanda Miller vs Dana Pine / Hollie Powell7-6, 6-0
2022-06-12vs FK - Little Shots (Centonze)Won 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Steed / Eileen Lombardo vs Barbara Slatton / Natalie Slatton6-3, 6-2
2022-06-04vs FK - Little Shots (Centonze)Split 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Steed / Eileen Lombardo vs Lori Croy / Pamela Plumlee6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTanner Watts / Debby Watts vs Barbara Slatton / Natalie Slatton6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Diana Royo
published 4
3.89
Tanner Watts
published
3.86
Eileen Lombardo
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.81
Debby Watts
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.80
Caroline Murray
published 4
3.65
Lynn Swets
published
3.64
Lisa Steed
published
3.48
Dina Sapienza
published 4
Jennifer Boyd
published
Jennifer Hewitson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eileen Lombardo + Dina Sapienza314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Royo
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
Tanner Watts
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Eileen Lombardo
304W–158L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Debby Watts
186W–79L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Caroline Murray
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Lynn Swets
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Lisa Steed
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Dina Sapienza
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
Jennifer Boyd
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Hewitson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.