Teams

HeronBay/Banham

2025 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Day · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-16vs Wrc/ BarrazaLost 12
W#1 DoublesMagally Bruce / Amanda Steely vs Paola Arnau / Polina Reisman6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesOdyssa Billings vs Monica Clinton3-6, 1-6
L#2 Doublesalejandra torek / Linda Restrepo vs Silvana Luft / Yamila Fernandez Barraza0-6, 4-6
2025-05-26vs Wrc/ BarrazaWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheryl Banham / Anabella Bhatti vs Lucila Valenzuela / Silvana Luft2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCielo Prete vs Monica Clinton6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesOdyssa Billings / Pia Echenique vs Irina Kazantsev / Polina Reisman6-0, 6-0
2025-05-05vs Wrc/ BarrazaWon 30
W#1 DoublesMagally Bruce / Cielo Prete vs Jona Moreno / Paola Arnau6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesCheryl Banham vs Monica Clinton6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnabella Bhatti / Jeanmarie Mahecha vs Holly Lick / Irina Kazantsev6-3, 6-0
2025-04-14vs Wrc/ BarrazaLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Steely / Cielo Prete vs Silvana Luft / Jona Moreno3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMagally Bruce vs Yiwen Fan6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnabella Bhatti / Cheryl Banham vs Yamila Fernandez Barraza / Melissa Clements6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.41
Anabella Bhatti
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.31
Magally Bruce
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.29
Odyssa Billings
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Alexandra Sanchez
published 2.5
Cielo Prete
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.24
Catalina Salcedo
published 2.5
2.19
Amanda Steely
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.17
Cheryl Banham
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.12
alejandra torek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Linda Restrepo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.97
Jeanmarie Mahecha
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mckenzie Lane
published
Pia Echenique
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Banham + Anabella Bhatti5260% games+10.6% vs expected
alejandra torek + Catalina Salcedo2345% games+2.1% vs expected
Odyssa Billings + alejandra torek224 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Steely + Linda Restrepo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Anabella Bhatti
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
Magally Bruce
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
Odyssa Billings
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Alexandra Sanchez
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Cielo Prete
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Catalina Salcedo
4W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Amanda Steely
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Cheryl Banham
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
alejandra torek
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Linda Restrepo
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Jeanmarie Mahecha
5W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Mckenzie Lane
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pia Echenique
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.