Teams

2-KTravis-Eno

2023 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-29vs 4-JRosen-CHCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Hsu / Tracey Maurer vs Frances Wilson / Sara Morgan3-6, 2-6
2023-09-13vs 3-OStephens/DErwin-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesKrissy Anderson / Tracey Maurer vs Julie Brigham / Elizabeth Black6-4, 6-1
2023-09-08vs 4-JRosen-CHCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Elder / Tracey Maurer vs Lucy Falk / Jane Holroyd6-2, 6-1
2023-09-01vs 5-SSmith-HVCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesLisa Hsu / Elisabeth Miller vs Kate Barron / Catherine Jefferson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKrissy Anderson / Tracey Maurer vs Aimee Poduri / Susan Hayes6-1, 6-1
2023-08-25vs 1-KJohnson-UNCLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeanne Murray / Lisa Hsu vs Vivian Muzyk / Courtney Whilden6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2023-08-11vs 3-OStephens/DErwin-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ogle / Tracey Maurer vs Laura Ross / Julie Liddle3-6, 4-6
2023-08-04vs 5-SSmith-HVCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Hsu / Jeanne Murray vs Hadley Nixon / Elizabeth Everett6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Travis / Tracey Maurer vs Stacey Smith / Betsy Euler6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Katie Elder
published
3.40
Amber Oberle
published 3.5
3.33
Tracey Maurer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Laura Riedel
published
3.28
Lisa Hsu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Krissy Anderson
published
3.20
Kelly Travis
published
3.19
Jennifer Ogle
published
2.97
Jeanne Murray
published
2.69
Blake Ellis
published 3
2.68
Beth Angle
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krissy Anderson + Tracey Maurer2351% games+1.0% vs expected
Lisa Hsu + Tracey Maurer5451% gamesnot enough data
Katie Elder + Tracey Maurer3251% gamesnot enough data
Laura Riedel + Blake Ellis0546% gamesnot enough data
Katie Elder + Krissy Anderson224 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Travis + Krissy Anderson224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Ogle + Tracey Maurer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Elder
65W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Amber Oberle
28W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Tracey Maurer
85W–63L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
Laura Riedel
15W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Lisa Hsu
93W–91L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Krissy Anderson
20W–23L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Kelly Travis
41W–36L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Jennifer Ogle
15W–25L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
Jeanne Murray
13W–31L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Blake Ellis
12W–27L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Beth Angle
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.