Teams

Toleu: 55 is new 40

2025 Adult 55 & Over Early Start Daytime · 8.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-02vs Stankovsky-BolineWon 21
W#1 DoublesSuzy Griffith / Janice Ring vs Lynne Kaufman / Johanna Hanson6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisbeth Sjoblad / Ann Stauch vs Sally McDonald / Carrie van Wert3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly Barry / Zeny McCoy vs Ann Boline / Mary Donovan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-25vs Ogren/Biewen 55+ ES25Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSuzy Griffith / Janice Ring vs Alison Blackowiak / Maria Johnson3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Olig / Leanne Collins vs Angela Fischels / Barbara Pjevach7-5
L#3 DoublesKimberly Barry / Zeny McCoy vs Lisa Ogren / Megan Murray-Bennett1-6, 2-6
2024-11-11vs Jensen 55+ Daytime ES25Won 21
W#1 DoublesLea Blackwell Favor / Wendy Richards vs Theresa Harich / Sarah Tuel6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnn Stauch / Lisbeth Sjoblad vs Alicia Andre / Lori Henrich7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKarla Toleu / Zeny McCoy vs Jane Hill / Laura Tiffany0-6, 3-6
2024-10-28vs Stankovsky-BolineLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanice Ring / Suzy Griffith vs Lynne O'Reilly / Carol Samuelson6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnn Stauch / Lisbeth Sjoblad vs Lynne Kaufman / Mary Donovan4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Olig / Leanne Collins vs Sally McDonald / Mary Stuart Snyder4-6, 4-6
2024-10-21vs Ogren/Biewen 55+ ES25Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJanice Ring / Suzy Griffith vs Alison Blackowiak / Maria Johnson2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLea Blackwell Favor / Wendy Richards vs Karen Nelson / Lisa Ogren2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Stauch / Lisbeth Sjoblad vs Laura Dale / Lorraine Hulbert6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-10-07vs Jensen 55+ Daytime ES25Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLisbeth Sjoblad / Ann Stauch vs Alicia Andre / Karen Ostenso6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSuzy Griffith / Karla Toleu vs Sarah Tuel / Theresa Harich7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Lea Blackwell Favor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.98
Ann Stauch
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.83
Janice Ring
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Zeny McCoy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Katie Pargal
published
3.55
Suzy Griffith
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.50
Kimberly Barry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Elizabeth Olig
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Lisbeth Sjoblad
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Karla Toleu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Wendy Richards
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Ring + Suzy Griffith141549% games+3.0% vs expected
Ann Stauch + Lisbeth Sjoblad41044% games−0.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Olig + Kimberly Barry1538% gamesnot enough data
Lea Blackwell Favor + Wendy Richards3254% gamesnot enough data
Karla Toleu + Katie Pargal1439% gamesnot enough data
Zeny McCoy + Kimberly Barry224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lea Blackwell Favor
46W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.13
4
Ann Stauch
10W–21L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Janice Ring
16W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Zeny McCoy
40W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Katie Pargal
27W–34L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Suzy Griffith
17W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Kimberly Barry
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Elizabeth Olig
16W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Lisbeth Sjoblad
20W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Karla Toleu
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Richards
9W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.