Teams

Mirror Lake - Prine/Roberts

2022 Combo 18 & Over Women Night - Mobile · 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.57 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-08-09vs MTC - GrimesWon 10
W#3 DoublesRachael Sigsbee / Kristi Sims vs Michele Grimes / Amanda Cook6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-19vs MTC - SheppardLost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Blankenship / Rachael Sigsbee vs Carrys Sasser / Jessica Winck2-6, 4-6
2022-07-12vs MTC - GrimesWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatie Cotton / Rachael Sigsbee vs Emily Rapoza / Lauren Aiyer6-3, 6-4
2022-05-31vs MTC - SheppardWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Cotton / Rachael Sigsbee vs Yulia Fedko / Rodah Wangondu6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ellen Williams
published 4
3.58
Blakely Prine
published 4
3.43
Kristi Sims
published
3.36
Ashley Howell
published 3.5
3.34
Savannah Vallee
published
Danielle Faircloth
published 3.5
3.25
3.14
Brittany Redditt
published 3.5
3.04
Hilary Seay
published 3.5
2.88
Kim Barnard
published
Rachael Sigsbee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Sarah Blankenship
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ellen Williams
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Blakely Prine
22W–6L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Kristi Sims
56W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Ashley Howell
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
Savannah Vallee
29W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Danielle Faircloth
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Herndon Nordmann
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Brittany Redditt
17W–15L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Hilary Seay
22W–15L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Kim Barnard
52W–51L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Rachael Sigsbee
109W–93L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Blankenship
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.