Teams

WALLENBERG PK 40MX8.0A

2024 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX8.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Tyler Nielson
published
4.29
Brian Heimbecker
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.13
Karen Cannon
published
4.13
Anthony Chaba
published 4
3.98
Shane Park
published
3.94
Sarah Speakman
published
3.87
May Wang
published
3.86
Emily Ling
published
3.82
Peter Madrid
published
3.80
Seth Hazen
published
3.75
Catherine Puzon
published 4
3.70
Johnny Cheng
published
3.63
Paul Kwon
published
3.62
Leyla Scott
published
3.56
Mina Fu
published
Eric Choksi
published
Marsha Heimbecker
published
Shaun Baoerjiin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Nielson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
4.39
5
Brian Heimbecker
367W–83L career · 16 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.29
Karen Cannon
17W–21L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
4.13
4
Anthony Chaba
24W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
4.13
Shane Park
6W–19L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.98
Sarah Speakman
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.94
May Wang
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
Emily Ling
42W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
Peter Madrid
16W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Seth Hazen
24W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Catherine Puzon
23W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.75
Johnny Cheng
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Paul Kwon
24W–16L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.63
Leyla Scott
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Mina Fu
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.56
Eric Choksi
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marsha Heimbecker
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shaun Baoerjiin
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.