Teams

LATA65/Robbins/SSP

65 & Over · 65 & Over LLAS - Men 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-13vs LLAS UPTA65A/Smith/SpindletreeLost 12
W#1 DoublesGary Bible / John McCoy vs Robert Medlin / Roland Fournier6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesStan Gooding / Tom Wright vs Kirk Villar / Tipton Bradford6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeon Freeman / Richard Robbins vs David Prier / Robert Jerdan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-10-13vs HHTL65/Luba/Port RoyalLost 12
L#1 DoublesGary Bible / Lanny Finley vs Bryan Steelman / Eddie Goodson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBruce Cutler / Leon Freeman vs Douglas Luba / Daniel Spar6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRichard Spangler / Walter Stanton vs Edward Hersperger / Thomas Aholt3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-10-12vs LCTA65/Lee/MPRLost 12
L#1 DoublesBruce Cutler / Stan Gooding vs Michael Draper / Leonard Douglas2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLanny Finley / John McCoy vs David Bruner / Charles Lee6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRichard Spangler / Tom Wright vs Samuel Bennett / Richard Weathers2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over LLAS - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Leon Freeman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Tom Wright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Bruce Cutler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.57
Gary Bible
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Stan Gooding
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
John McCoy
published
Lanny Finley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Robbins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Spangler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Walter Stanton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stan Gooding + Tom Wright1442% games+2.9% vs expected
John McCoy + Gary Bible4349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leon Freeman
45W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
Tom Wright
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Bruce Cutler
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
Gary Bible
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
Stan Gooding
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
34%65%<1%
3.56
John McCoy
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lanny Finley
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Robbins
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Richard Spangler
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Walter Stanton
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.