Teams

Yadkin/Adams/18+3.0

2026 Yadkin Valley Singles 18 & Over · Men 3.0 - Thursday Evening

6 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-20vs Yadkin/Garza/18+3.0Lost 03
L#1 SinglesJohn Merriam vs Jonathan Garza4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDylan Adams vs Michael Jones4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesTyler Oakley vs Nathan Travers0-6, 1-6
2026-08-13vs Coordinator TeamLost 01
L#3 SinglesRT Ferrell vs Michael Glontz0-6, 2-6
2026-07-30vs Yadkin/Garza/18+3.0Lost 12
W#1 SinglesDrew Blackwell vs Michael Jones6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesDylan Adams vs Jonathan Garza7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesRT Ferrell vs Nathan Travers1-6, 1-6
2026-07-27vs Coordinator TeamLost 12
W#1 SinglesScott Smyre vs Michael Glontz6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJohn Merriam vs Ryan Brown4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesTyler Oakley vs Justin Shumaker1-6, 0-6
2026-07-09vs Yadkin/Garza/18+3.0Won 21
W#1 SinglesDrew Blackwell vs Michael Jones4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJohn Merriam vs Drew Brackett0-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesDylan Adams vs Nathan Travers6-3, 6-4
2026-07-02vs Coordinator TeamWon 21
L#1 SinglesDrew Blackwell vs Sean Stevens2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesScott Smyre vs Michael Glontz6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesRT Ferrell vs Jacob Turner6-2, 6-1
2026-06-11vs Yadkin/Garza/18+3.0Lost 12
W#1 SinglesScott Smyre vs Michael Jones6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesDylan Adams vs Drew Brackett1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesTyler Oakley vs Jonathan Garza4-6, 3-6
2026-06-04vs Coordinator TeamLost 12
L#1 SinglesScott Smyre vs Sean Stevens4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDylan Adams vs Ryan Brown2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesJohn Merriam vs Michael Glontz6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 - Thursday Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Drew Blackwell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.96
Scott Smyre
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.65
Dylan Adams
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
2.55
John Merriam
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.50
RT Ferrell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.49
Tyler Oakley
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Oakley + Dylan Adams033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Drew Blackwell
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Scott Smyre
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Dylan Adams
4W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
John Merriam
4W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
RT Ferrell
2W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Tyler Oakley
0W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.