Teams

Ca.Robayo18S3.5

2023 Cap Fall Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-10vs Ol.Stephens18SLost 02
L#2 SinglesLaurene Fitzgerald vs Vanese Clough2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesCarolina Robayo vs Dianna Erwin5-7, 0-6
2023-10-09vs Ka.Warren18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesCarolina Robayo vs Parker Rumley7-5, 6-2
2023-09-26vs La.Cox18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesGillian Kelleher vs Kim Peters3-6, 4-6
2023-09-19Won 10
W#2 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Rebecca Fisher6-0, 6-2
2023-09-13Won 10
W#3 SinglesLaurene Fitzgerald vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-10vs Me.Bennett18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Jenna Dysart6-0, 6-4
2023-08-08vs Ol.Stephens18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Liz Chen6-1, 6-1
2023-08-01Won 20
W#2 SinglesGillian Kelleher vs Amy Clarke6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesCarolina Robayo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Mariana Lima Gonzalez
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.16
Gillian Kelleher
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Angelica Rose
published 3.5
3.15
Carolina Robayo
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Lola Jefferies
published
2.84
Laurene Fitzgerald
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Laura Rendon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolina Robayo + Gillian Kelleher2544% gamesnot enough data
Carolina Robayo + Laurene Fitzgerald1444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mariana Lima Gonzalez
129W–73L career · 6 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Gillian Kelleher
166W–164L career · 6 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Angelica Rose
9W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Carolina Robayo
145W–190L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.15
Lola Jefferies
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Laurene Fitzgerald
101W–157L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
Laura Rendon
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.