Teams

CAC/SL-Caponigro

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

1 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Jinhee Park
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2024-03-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesHolly Anderson / Jinhee Park vs KC Mattingly-Nelson / Nancy Burdyshaw1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJinhee Park / Joan Wilson vs Sonal Nyati / Jeannie Pae7-6, 7-6
2024-03-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Carey / Jinhee Park vs Baxi Vu / Waid Louie6-4, 6-1
2024-02-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Carey / Jinhee Park vs Julie Fretwell / Carol Buckingham6-4, 6-2
2024-02-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoan Wilson / Jinhee Park vs Rose Marie Gai / Debra Egge6-3, 6-1
2024-02-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesHolly Anderson / Jinhee Park vs Kathy Schmid / Shirley Chow6-3, 7-6
2024-01-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Anderson / Jinhee Park vs Jennifer Johnson / Susan Hurt6-4, 7-6
2024-01-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesHolly Anderson / Jinhee Park vs Kirsten Graham / Pam MacDuff6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jinhee Park
102W–57L career
0%99%0%
3.27

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.