Teams

NEGTA/Mary Ann West

2024 NEGTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Cheryl Stone
published 3
2.98
Karen Potts
published
2.98
Diana Stout
published 3
2.94
Sue Mayfield
published
2.92
Debbie Wiley
published 3
2.92
Rhonda Beck
published
2.88
Mary Cialella-Smith
published
2.85
Stewart Mary Jo
published
2.83
Michele Gregory
published
2.77
Mary Ann West
published
Bree Law
published 3
2.75
Rosemarie Long
published
Rhonda Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Stout + Debbie Wiley8063% games+10.1% vs expected
Stewart Mary Jo + Michele Gregory5452% games+2.8% vs expected
Sue Mayfield + Mary Cialella-Smith6162% games+2.0% vs expected
Rhonda Beck + Diana Stout6160% games+1.1% vs expected
Mary Ann West + Cheryl Stone10558% games+1.0% vs expected
Rhonda Beck + Rosemarie Long404 matchesnot enough data
Diana Stout + Stewart Mary Jo314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Potts + Mary Cialella-Smith224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cheryl Stone
34W–16L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
Karen Potts
42W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Diana Stout
35W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
Sue Mayfield
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Debbie Wiley
23W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.92
Rhonda Beck
20W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
Mary Cialella-Smith
21W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
Stewart Mary Jo
38W–41L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
2.85
Michele Gregory
76W–52L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
Mary Ann West
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Bree Law
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rosemarie Long
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
Rhonda Anderson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.