Teams

Hobbs/Nauman 18+ W23

2023 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-13vs Wernet 18+ W23Won 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Frascone / Jennie Ollila vs Kathryn Dehn / Katie Wernet6-3, 6-3
2023-03-06vs Hurd/Harris 18+ W23Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Frascone / Jennie Ollila vs Marcia Harris / Sarah LeDoux6-2, 7-6
2023-02-27vs ALLEX 3.5 18+ W23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Frascone / Jamie Lukehart-Hobbs vs Barb Brown / Sara Erickson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Frascone / Teri Heltne vs Tara Johnson / Emily Starita1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-01-30vs Hurd/Harris 18+ W23Won 10
W#1 DoublesJanet Nauman / Jennifer Frascone vs Catherine Carney / Susan Stombaugh6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJamie Lukehart-Hobbs / Jennifer Frascone vs Maggie Hillmer / Melodie Marx6-1, 7-6
W#1 DoublesJanet Nauman / Jennifer Frascone vs Amy Stern / Katie Day3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Rachel Holtz
published
3.67
Lizbeth Hansen
published
3.57
Jennie Ollila
published
3.47
Kerry Norgaard
published
3.45
3.43
Jennifer Frascone
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.22
Christina Schwie
published 3.5
3.19
Janet Nauman
published
3.08
Dunja Sher
published
3.00
Teri Heltne
published
2.89
Kathleen Hultman
published
Susan Ledray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Heltne + Kathleen Hultman314 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Norgaard + Jennie Ollila134 matchesnot enough data
Lizbeth Hansen + Jennie Ollila224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Holtz
29W–20L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Lizbeth Hansen
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
Jennie Ollila
15W–17L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
Kerry Norgaard
30W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
Jamie Lukehart-Hobbs
27W–35L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
Jennifer Frascone
101W–81L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Christina Schwie
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.22
Janet Nauman
9W–37L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Dunja Sher
13W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.08
Teri Heltne
14W–19L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00
Kathleen Hultman
49W–37L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
Susan Ledray
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.